You can have your cake and eat it too: Embracing paradox of safety as source of progress in safety science. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hu, Xiaowen; Casey, Tristan; Griffin, Mark
• Is Part Of: Safety science. Volume 130(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Paradox -- Future of safety -- Safety leadership -- Safety performance; Industrial accidents -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques; 363.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104824
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0925-7535

Abstract

Highlights: Explored the nature of paradoxes of safety. Identified organisational strategies to manage safety paradoxes. Discussed the implication for safety leadership and performance research. Highlighted emerging safety paradoxes engendered by the digital revolution Abstract: Safety is typically cast as a trade-off with other priorities, such as production and efficiency. Such an approach sets up dramatic tension between organisational goals—an 'either-or' situation. Alternatively, safety can be framed as something that can be achieved simultaneously with other goals—a 'both-and' situation. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the paradoxical nature of safety and to explore how paradoxical insights might advance safety research and practices. We integrate the organisational paradox and safety literature to explore the nature of safety paradoxes and how organisations can manage them using different strategies. We then move on to discuss the implications for micro-level safety leadership and performance research. Finally, we explore the paradoxical nature of safety management in practice by highlighting emerging safety paradoxes that result from digitisation, diversification, and increasing complexity, and provide recommendations to manage them.