Exploratory Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Utility‐Scale Battery Storage Technologies for Multiple Grid Services Based on Life‐Cycle Approaches. Issue 11 (23rd December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Exploratory Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Utility‐Scale Battery Storage Technologies for Multiple Grid Services Based on Life‐Cycle Approaches. Issue 11 (23rd December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Exploratory Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Utility‐Scale Battery Storage Technologies for Multiple Grid Services Based on Life‐Cycle Approaches
- Authors:
- Baumann, Manuel
Peters, Jens
Weil, Marcel - Other Names:
- Fthenakis Vasilis guestEditor.
Raugei Marco guestEditor. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Herein, a multicriteria decision‐making analysis (MCDA) of eight different utility‐scale battery storage technologies for four different application areas, involving 72 relevant stakeholders from industry and academia for criteria selection and weighting, is presented. The assessment is conducted for economic, environmental, technological, and social criteria using a combination of the analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. It includes a full life‐cycle costing and life‐cycle assessment using current data. Indicative rankings show that most lithium‐ion batteries can be recommended for all application areas. Lead‐acid batteries achieve rather low scores depending on the viewed application, but including a recycling scenario for this technology might lead to significant changes in final scores and rankings. This is also true for the redox flow battery. Furthermore, the weights provided by the stakeholders are very dispersing, leading to a low consensus about the relevance of the used criteria. In particular, social criteria are not well differentiated in the current state and do not add significant distinguishing features between different battery technologies. Abstract : Multicriteria decision‐making analysis (MCDA) including life‐cycle approaches and stakeholder input can provide case‐specific decision support for the selection of batteries for grid services. Considered battery technologies score differentlyAbstract : Herein, a multicriteria decision‐making analysis (MCDA) of eight different utility‐scale battery storage technologies for four different application areas, involving 72 relevant stakeholders from industry and academia for criteria selection and weighting, is presented. The assessment is conducted for economic, environmental, technological, and social criteria using a combination of the analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. It includes a full life‐cycle costing and life‐cycle assessment using current data. Indicative rankings show that most lithium‐ion batteries can be recommended for all application areas. Lead‐acid batteries achieve rather low scores depending on the viewed application, but including a recycling scenario for this technology might lead to significant changes in final scores and rankings. This is also true for the redox flow battery. Furthermore, the weights provided by the stakeholders are very dispersing, leading to a low consensus about the relevance of the used criteria. In particular, social criteria are not well differentiated in the current state and do not add significant distinguishing features between different battery technologies. Abstract : Multicriteria decision‐making analysis (MCDA) including life‐cycle approaches and stakeholder input can provide case‐specific decision support for the selection of batteries for grid services. Considered battery technologies score differently depending on the application. Lithium‐ion batteries turn out as all‐rounders, but a detailed view on recycling is required for all technologies. Furthermore, several tripping points have to be addressed in an MCDA assessment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy technology. Volume 8:Issue 11(2020:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Energy technology
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 11(2020:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0008-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12-23
- Subjects:
- battery energy storages -- decision making -- renewable energy systems -- life-cycle costing -- life-cycle assessments -- multicriteria decision-making analysis -- sustainability
Energy development -- Periodicals
Power resources -- Periodicals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2194-4296/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ente.201901019 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2194-4288
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.815600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23684.xml