Modelling inequality in reported long term illness in the UK: combining individual and area characteristics. Issue 3 (June 1996)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shouls, S; Congdon, P; Curtis, S
• Is Part Of: Journal of epidemiology and community health. Volume 50:Issue 3(1996)
• Page Start: 366
• Page End: 376
• Publication Date: 1996-06
• Subjects: Public health -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1136/jech.50.3.366
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-005X

Abstract

Abstract : STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature of the relation between health and social factors at both the aggregated scale of geographical areas and the individual scale. DESIGN AND SETTING: The individual data are derived from the sample of anonymised records (SAR) from the census of 1991 in Great Britain, and are combined with area data from this census. The ecological setting (context) was defined using multivariate methods to classify the 278 districts of residence identifiable in the SAR. The outcome health variable is the 1991 census long-term limiting illness question. Health variations were analysed by multilevel logistic regression to examine the compositional variation (at the level of the individual) and the contextual variation (variability operating at the level of districts) in reported illness. PARTICIPANTS: 10 per cent randomised subsample of the SAR who are aged 16+ and are resident in households. MAIN RESULTS: The multi-level modelling revealed that area factors have a significant association with individual health outcome but their effect is smaller than that of individual attributes. The results show evidence for both compositional and contextual effects in the pattern of variation in propensity to report illness. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest generally higher levels of ill health for individuals who are older, not married, in a semi/unskilled manual social class, and socioeconomically deprived (as measured by a composite deprivation score). All individuals living in areas with high levels of illness (which tend to be more deprived areas) show greater morbidity, even after allowing for their individual characteristics. However, within affluent areas, where morbidity was generally lower, the health inequality (health gradient) between rich and poor individuals was particularly strong. We consider the implications of these findings for health and resource allocation policy.