Crowding-in or Crowding-out? How Subsidies Signal the Path to Financial Independence of Social Enterprises. Issue 3 (27th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reichert, Patrick; Hudon, Marek; Szafarz, Ariane; Christensen, Robert K
• Is Part Of: Perspectives on public management and governance. Volume 4:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 291
• Page End: 308
• Publication Date: 2021-07-27
• Subjects: Public administration -- Periodicals; Local government -- Periodicals; Administrative agencies -- Management -- Periodicals; 351.05
• DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvab014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-4910

Abstract

Abstract: In today's multisector configurations, there is little clarity about whether and how public and private subsidies influence social enterprises' pursuit of financial stability. We address the strategic role of donors in the social-business life cycle whereby social enterprise start-ups rely on subsidies, while mature social enterprises strive for independence from donors. To address the "missing middle, " we develop a typology of subsidy instruments and an intermediary signaling model to clarify how subsidies shape the evolution of outcomes for social enterprises. We argue that source variation matters for certain instruments like corporate intangibles and governmentally subsidized credit guarantees, which trigger crowding-in effects and attract commercial partners, while preventing perverse crowding-out effects, such as soft budget constraints. To illustrate this commercialization story, we draw upon a microfinance case study, demonstrating how public and private donors can induce crowding-in and crowding-out effects. In short, our subsidy typology helps unpack the signals that public and private subsidies send to commercial funders of social enterprises and how they shape the path to future financial independence.