What can we learn from N2O isotope data? – Analytics, processes and modelling. (12th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, Longfei; Harris, Eliza; Lewicka‐Szczebak, Dominika; Barthel, Matti; Blomberg, Margareta R.A.; Harris, Stephen J.; Johnson, Matthew S.; Lehmann, Moritz F.; Liisberg, Jesper; Müller, Christoph; Ostrom, Nathaniel E.; Six, Johan; Toyoda, Sakae; Yoshida, Naohiro; Mohn, Joachim
• Is Part Of: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry. Volume 34:Number 20(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-08-12
• Subjects: Mass spectrometry -- Periodicals; 543.65
• DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8858
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0951-4198

Abstract

Abstract : The isotopic composition of nitrous oxide (N2 O) provides useful information for evaluating N2 O sources and budgets. Due to the co‐occurrence of multiple N2 O transformation pathways, it is, however, challenging to use isotopic information to quantify the contribution of distinct processes across variable spatiotemporal scales. Here, we present an overview of recent progress in N2 O isotopic studies and provide suggestions for future research, mainly focusing on: analytical techniques; production and consumption processes; and interpretation and modelling approaches. Comparing isotope‐ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) with laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS), we conclude that IRMS is a precise technique for laboratory analysis of N2 O isotopes, while LAS is more suitable for in situ /inline studies and offers advantages for site‐specific analyses. When reviewing the link between the N2 O isotopic composition and underlying mechanisms/processes, we find that, at the molecular scale, the specific enzymes and mechanisms involved determine isotopic fractionation effects. In contrast, at plot‐to‐global scales, mixing of N2 O derived from different processes and their isotopic variability must be considered. We also find that dual isotope plots are effective for semi‐quantitative attribution of co‐occurring N2 O production and reduction processes. More recently, process‐based N2 O isotopic models have been developed for natural abundance and 15 N‐tracing studies, and have been shown to be effective, particularly for data with adequate temporal resolution. Despite the significant progress made over the last decade, there is still great need and potential for future work, including development of analytical techniques, reference materials and inter‐laboratory comparisons, further exploration of N2 O formation and destruction mechanisms, more observations across scales, and design and validation of interpretation and modelling approaches. Synthesizing all these efforts, we are confident that the N2 O isotope community will continue to advance our understanding of N2 O transformation processes in all spheres of the Earth, and in turn to gain improved constraints on regional and global budgets.