Comparison of the intraocular pressure following an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macula oedema in vitrectomised and non-vitrectomised eyes. Issue 1 (8th January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of the intraocular pressure following an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macula oedema in vitrectomised and non-vitrectomised eyes. Issue 1 (8th January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of the intraocular pressure following an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macula oedema in vitrectomised and non-vitrectomised eyes
- Authors:
- Orii, Yusuke
Gozawa, Makoto
Takamura, Yoshihiro
Takeuchi, Yuko
Morioka, Masakazu
Yamada, Yutaka
Matsumura, Takehiro
Sugimoto, Masahiko
Inatani, Masaru - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) after an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) between vitrectomised and non-vitrectomised eyes in patients with diabetes and diabetic macular oedema (DME). Design: Retrospective comparative study Methods: Medical records of 157 patients (157 eyes) with type 2 diabetes who received IVTA for DME were reviewed, and the best-corrected visual acuity, IOP and optical central retinal thickness (CRT) were compared preoperatively, at 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after IVTA between the vitrectomised and non-vitrectomised groups. Results: IOP significantly increased at 1 (p<0.0001), 4 (p<0.0001), 8 (p<0.0001), 12 (p=0.0019), 16 (p=0.0006) and 20 weeks (p=0.0191) in the non-vitrectomised group, whereas a significant increase was only observed at 1 (p=0.0003) and 4 weeks (p=0.0006) in the vitrectomised group. ΔIOP, IOP changes from baseline, in the non-vitrectomised group was significantly higher than that in the vitrectomised group at 4 (p=0.0014), 8 (p=0.0081), 12 (p=0.0032) and 16 weeks (p=0.0038). No significant difference was observed in logMAR and CRT at any time point after IVTA between the two groups. Conclusions: After an initial IVTA, increased IOP and ΔIOP from the baseline IOP were significantly more frequently observed in the non-vitrectomised than that in the vitrectomised group. IVTA is a safer and more effective treatment option for DME in vitrectomised than that in non-vitrectomised eyes.
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open ophthalmology. Volume 6:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- BMJ open ophthalmology
- Issue:
- Volume 6:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0006-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01-08
- Subjects:
- treatment medical
Ophthalmology -- Periodicals
617.7005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjophth.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000620 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2397-3269
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23620.xml