DIGITAL SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AS A STRATEGY FOR UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN THE PARTICIPATION OF PATIENTS IN HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Issue 12 (18th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Provost, Shannon; Gloor, Peter; Seid, Michael; Margolis, Peter
• Is Part Of: BMJ quality & safety. Volume 25:Issue 12(2016)
• Page Start: 1004
• Page End: 1004
• Publication Date: 2016-11-18
• Subjects: Accreditation -- Anaesthesia -- Attitudes; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 362.106805
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-IHIabstracts.16
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-5415

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Healthcare improvement work benefits from diverse stakeholder participation. Great strides are being made towards formal collaborative relationships with patients and their caregivers. But how will we know if these overtures evolve into true partnerships? Reliable methods for tracking participation are needed to understand and enumerate how contributions of patients and families may impact costs, care, and outcomes. Objectives: We share an innovative approach to evaluating participation in healthcare improvement initiatives. Social network analysis (SNA) offers insight around the extent to which patient involvement on improvement teams is authentic and comparable to that of conventional contributors (e.g., clinicians and professional researchers). Methods: Using digital archives of email correspondence from 24 participants in a design project for pediatric chronic illness care, we generated email-network graphs over 19 months (January 2013–July 2014) to visually identify collaborators, measure communication behaviors, and quantify their prominence within the group network. We used scatterplots and Shewhart charts to compare network-based measures for patients and parents over time and relative to other participants. Results: Longitudinal email-based SNA provided evidence of a qualitative trend of increased patient and parent participation throughout the project. X-bar charts showed common cause variation in centrality measures for patients/parents alongside clinicians and researchers, evidence of similar positioning within the group network as well as comparable levels of communication. Conclusions: SNA is a reliable and relatively unobtrusive method to detect and monitor participation in collaborative work groups. Next, we explore how this approach could inform design and management of improvement efforts that meaningfully involve more patients and their caregivers.Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3