Multi-observer concordance and accuracy of the British Thoracic Society scale and other visual assessment qualitative criteria for solid pulmonary nodule assessment using FDG PET-CT. Issue 11 (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fatania, K.; Brown, P.J.; Xie, C.; McDermott, G.; Callister, M.E.J.; Graham, R.; Subesinghe, M.; Gleeson, F.V.; Scarsbrook, A.F.
• Is Part Of: Clinical radiology. Volume 75:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 878.e21
• Page End: 878.e28
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Medical radiology; Radiotherapy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9260

Abstract

Abstract : AIM: To compare the interobserver reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) scale and other visual assessment criteria in the context of 2-[ 18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d- glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) evaluation of solid pulmonary nodules (SPNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent FDG PET-CT for assessment of a SPN were identified. Seven reporters with varied experience at four centres graded FDG uptake visually using the British Thoracic Society (BTS) four-point scale. Five reporters also scored SPNs according to three- and five-point visual assessment scales and using semi-quantitative assessment (maximum standardised uptake value [SUVmax ]). Interobserver reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Cohen's kappa (κ). Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Good interobserver reliability was demonstrated with the BTS scale (ICC=0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.85) and five-point scale (ICC=0.78, 95 CI 0.68–0.86), whilst the three-point scale demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC=0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80). Almost perfect agreement was achieved between two consultants (κ=0.85), and substantial agreement between two other consultants (κ=0.78) using the BTS scale. ROC curves for the BTS and five-point scales demonstrated equivalent accuracy (BTS area under the ROC curve [AUC]=0.768; five-point AUC=0.768). SUVmax was no more accurate compared to the BTS scale (SUVmax AUC=0.794; BTS AUC=0.768, p =0.43). CONCLUSIONS: The BTS scale can be applied reliably by reporters with varied levels of PET-CT reporting experience, across different centres and has a diagnostic performance that is not surpassed by alternative scales. Highlights: British Thoracic Society scale of FDG uptake has good inter-observer agreement. British Thoracic Society scale is as reliable as 3 and 5 point visual scales. Visual assessment showed good agreement between reporters across institutions. Semi-quantitative assessment did not improve the diagnostic accuracy.