Grading meningiomas using mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Issue 8 (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Grading meningiomas using mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Issue 8 (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Grading meningiomas using mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging
- Authors:
- Lin, L.
Xue, Y.
Duan, Q.
Chen, X.
Chen, H.
Jiang, R.
Zhong, T.
Xu, G.
Geng, D.
Zhang, J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : AIM: To prospectively evaluate and compare the potential of various diffusion metrics obtained from mono-exponential model (MEM), bi-exponential model (BEM), and stretched exponential model (SEM)-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the grading of meningiomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive 93 patients with histopathologically confirmed meningiomas received DWI of multiple b-values. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction ( f ), water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (alpha), and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were calculated and compared between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas. Receiver operating characteristic and multivariable stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different parameters. RESULTS: The mean and normalised ADC, D, f, and DDC values were significantly lower in high-grade meningiomas than those in low-grade meningiomas (all p< 0.05). The AUCs of D and DDC were significantly higher than that of f in the differentiation (all p< 0.05). D was the only variable that could be used to independently differentiate high-grade and low-grade meningiomas ( p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Different models of DWI, including MEM, BEM, and SEM, are useful in the differentiating high-grade and low-grade meningiomas; however, D obtained from BEM is the most promising diffusion parameter for predicting the grade ofAbstract : AIM: To prospectively evaluate and compare the potential of various diffusion metrics obtained from mono-exponential model (MEM), bi-exponential model (BEM), and stretched exponential model (SEM)-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the grading of meningiomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive 93 patients with histopathologically confirmed meningiomas received DWI of multiple b-values. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction ( f ), water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (alpha), and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were calculated and compared between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas. Receiver operating characteristic and multivariable stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different parameters. RESULTS: The mean and normalised ADC, D, f, and DDC values were significantly lower in high-grade meningiomas than those in low-grade meningiomas (all p< 0.05). The AUCs of D and DDC were significantly higher than that of f in the differentiation (all p< 0.05). D was the only variable that could be used to independently differentiate high-grade and low-grade meningiomas ( p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Different models of DWI, including MEM, BEM, and SEM, are useful in the differentiating high-grade and low-grade meningiomas; however, D obtained from BEM is the most promising diffusion parameter for predicting the grade of meningiomas. Highlights: DWI-derived parameters from different models can help to grade meningiomas. D and DDC are superior to f in distinguishing low-grade from high-grade meningiomas. D derived from BEM is the strongest independent factor for predicting the grade of meningiomas. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical radiology. Volume 74:Issue 8(2019)
- Journal:
- Clinical radiology
- Issue:
- Volume 74:Issue 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 74, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 74
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0074-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 651.e15
- Page End:
- 651.e23
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Medical radiology
Radiotherapy
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099260 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9260
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.350000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23615.xml