The impact of location, time and practice effects on computerised cognitive testing using msreactor in people with multiple sclerosis. Issue 5 (8th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walt, Anneke Van der; Merlo, Daniel; Kalincik, Tomas; Haartsen, Jodi; Darby, David G; Butzkueven, Helmut
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 88:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: e1
• Page End: e1
• Publication Date: 2017-05-08
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316074.100
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3050

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To evaluate the effects of different testing environments and repeat testing using a computerised, automatically scored, self-administered MS cognitive battery: MSreactor (www.msreactor.com). Methods: MSreactor monitors processing speed, attention and working memory. Participants confirm a ball's appearance (Simple Reaction Test, (SRT)), react to the ball's colour (Choice Reaction Test (CRT)) and detect if consecutive cards are identical (One Back Test (OBT)). Participants were offered 6 months clinic, or home-based testing every 1 to 3 months. Linear mixed models were constructed where the dependent variable was reaction time outcomes (SRT, CHRT, OBK), and independent variables were location or the home test number/order. Fixed effects included: EDSS, time of day and sex. Results: Three-hundred and seventy four MS patients completed baseline clinic testing; 166 had repeated clinic testing at the time of extraction. 84.5% of the cohort agreed to home and clinic testing with repeat testing compliance of 80%. Reaction times for all tests were 3% faster (p<0.001) at first home compared with the first clinic test, with no difference detected between second clinic/home test. Reaction times for SRT, CRT and OBK was 5.7% to 6.8% slower in the morning (p<0.001) regardless of location. EDSS was associated with slower reaction times in the first clinic/home comparison only. Reaction times during repeat home testing increased by 1.5%–2% with each unit increase in EDSS. Analysis of repeat home testing (first 5 home tests) showed no practice effect on SRT and CHRT scores but OBK reaction times decreased slightly by 0.8% (p<0.001) for each additional home test. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the reliability of MSreactor scores with minimal testing environment or practice related effects observed on SRT and CHRT reaction times. MSreactor provides a feasible testing platform for cognitive monitoring in MS and our results will assist in defining clinically relevant changes in cognitive monitoring scores over time.