A randomised controlled trial. Shifting boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments. Issue 10 (1st October 1999)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomised controlled trial. Shifting boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments. Issue 10 (1st October 1999)
- Main Title:
- A randomised controlled trial. Shifting boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments.
- Authors:
- Daker-White, G
Carr, A J
Harvey, I
Woolhead, G
Bannister, G
Nelson, I
Kammerling, M - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of specially trained physiotherapists in the assessment and management of defined referrals to hospital orthopaedic departments. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Orthopaedic outpatient departments in two hospitals. SUBJECTS: 481 patients with musculoskeletal problems referred for specialist orthopaedic opinion. INTERVENTIONS: Initial assessment and management undertaken by post-Fellowship junior orthopaedic surgeons, or by specially trained physiotherapists working in an extended role (orthopaedic physiotherapy specialists). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient centred measures of pain, functional disability and perceived handicap. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients were eligible to join the trial, 481 (73.6%) gave their consent to be randomised. The two arms (doctor n = 244, physiotherapist n = 237) were similar at baseline. Baseline and follow up questionnaires were completed by 383 patients (79.6%). The mean time to follow up was 5.6 months after randomisation, with similar distributions of intervals to follow up in both arms. The only outcome for which there was a statistically or clinically important difference between arms was in a measure of patient satisfaction, which favoured the physiotherapist arm. A cost minimisation analysis showed no significant differences in direct costs to the patient or NHS primary care costs. Direct hospital costs were lower (p < 0.00001) in the physiotherapistAbstract : OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of specially trained physiotherapists in the assessment and management of defined referrals to hospital orthopaedic departments. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Orthopaedic outpatient departments in two hospitals. SUBJECTS: 481 patients with musculoskeletal problems referred for specialist orthopaedic opinion. INTERVENTIONS: Initial assessment and management undertaken by post-Fellowship junior orthopaedic surgeons, or by specially trained physiotherapists working in an extended role (orthopaedic physiotherapy specialists). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient centred measures of pain, functional disability and perceived handicap. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients were eligible to join the trial, 481 (73.6%) gave their consent to be randomised. The two arms (doctor n = 244, physiotherapist n = 237) were similar at baseline. Baseline and follow up questionnaires were completed by 383 patients (79.6%). The mean time to follow up was 5.6 months after randomisation, with similar distributions of intervals to follow up in both arms. The only outcome for which there was a statistically or clinically important difference between arms was in a measure of patient satisfaction, which favoured the physiotherapist arm. A cost minimisation analysis showed no significant differences in direct costs to the patient or NHS primary care costs. Direct hospital costs were lower (p < 0.00001) in the physiotherapist arm (mean cost per patient = 256 Pounds, n = 232), as they were less likely to order radiographs and to refer patients for orthopaedic surgery than were the junior doctors (mean cost per patient in arm = 498 Pounds, n = 238). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the patient centred outcomes measured in this randomised trial, orthopaedic physiotherapy specialists are as effective as post-Fellowship junior staff and clinical assistant orthopaedic surgeons in the initial assessment and management of new referrals to outpatient orthopaedic departments, and generate lower initial direct hospital costs. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of epidemiology and community health. Volume 53:Issue 10(1999)
- Journal:
- Journal of epidemiology and community health
- Issue:
- Volume 53:Issue 10(1999)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 53, Issue 10 (1999)
- Year:
- 1999
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 1999-0053-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 643
- Page End:
- 650
- Publication Date:
- 1999-10-01
- Subjects:
- Public health -- Periodicals
Epidemiology -- Periodicals
614.4 - Journal URLs:
- http://jech.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/0143005X.html ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=165&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jech.53.10.643 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0143-005X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23631.xml