Comparison of locking compression plate and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study. Issue 10 (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fu, Peng; Liang, Wenwei; Gao, Zhenzhen; Zheng, Song; Fan, Weimin
• Is Part Of: Journal of international medical research. Volume 50:Issue 10(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Periprosthetic fracture -- distal femur -- total knee arthroplasty -- locking compression plate -- distal femoral replacement; Medicine -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1177/03000605221133012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-0605

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of locking compression plate (LCP) and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty. Methods: This retrospective study identified patients with PDFFs in an institutional database between January 2012 and December 2021. Demographic data and clinical outcomes, including postoperative complications, reoperation, 1-year mortality, Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) were analysed. Results: In total, 12 patients treated with LCP and six patients treated with DFR were included. There was no significant difference between the LCP and DFR groups in terms of postoperative complications (25.0% versus 33.3%, respectively), reoperation (8.3% versus 0.0%), respectively, 1-year mortality (8.3% versus 16.7%, respectively) or mean ± SD KSS (80.3 ± 8.3 versus 78.0 ± 2.5, respectively). However, the mean ± SD KSFS was significantly better for patients with LCP than for those with DFR (51.8 ± 12.5 versus 37.0 ± 6.7, respectively). Conclusion: DFR provides similar clinical outcomes compared with LCP for PDFFs. Patients with advanced age may benefit from DFR to allow early weight bearing.