Evaluation of the Solus One Salmonella Assay in Select Foods: Collaborative Study: First Action 2020.03. (8th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bastin, Benjamin; Benzinger, M Joseph; Crowley, Erin S; Agin, James; Wakefield, Raymond
• Is Part Of: Journal of AOAC International. Volume 103:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1568
• Page End: 1581
• Publication Date: 2020-06-08
• Subjects: Agricultural chemistry -- Periodicals; Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals; 543
• DOI: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa071
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1060-3271

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The Solus One Salmonella immunoassay utilizes Salmonella specific selective media and automated liquid handling, for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in select food types. Objective: The candidate method was evaluated using 375 g test portions in an unpaired study design for a single matrix, instant non-fat dry milk (NFDM) powder. Method: The matrix was compared to the United States Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. Eleven participants from 10 laboratories within academia and industry, located within the United States, Mexico, South Africa, Germany, and the United Kingdom, contributed data for the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix: an uninoculated control level [0 colony forming units (CFU)/test portion], a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). Statistical analysis was conducted according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. Results: Results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a dLPOD value with a 95% confidence interval between the candidate method confirmed (both alternative and conventional confirmation procedures) and the reference method of 0.07 (−0.02, 0.15). Conclusions: The dLPOD results indicate equivalence between the candidate method and the reference method for the matrix evaluated and the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False positive and false negative rates were determined for the matrix and produce values of <2%. Highlights: Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis.