Investigation of Regression-Based Effect Size Methods Developed in Single-Subject Studies. Issue 6 (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sen, Nihal
• Is Part Of: Behavior modification. Volume 46:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: 1346
• Page End: 1382
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: regression-based methods -- single subject research -- effect size -- meta-analysis; Behavior modification -- Periodicals; Behavior therapy -- Periodicals; 153.85
• DOI: 10.1177/01454455211054018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0145-4455

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide a brief introduction to effect size calculation in single-subject design studies, including a description of nonparametric and regression-based effect sizes. We then focus the rest of the tutorial on common regression-based methods used to calculate effect size in single-subject experimental studies. We start by first describing the difference between five regression-based methods (Gorsuch, White et al., Center et al., Allison and Gorman, Huitema and McKean). This is followed by an example using the five regression-based effect size methods and a demonstration how these methods can be applied using a sample data set. In this way, the question of how the values obtained from different effect size methods differ was answered. The specific regression models used in these five regression-based methods and how these models can be obtained from the SPSS program were shown. R 2 values obtained from these five methods were converted to Cohen's d value and compared in this study. The d values obtained from the same data set were estimated as 0.003, 0.357, 2.180, 3.470, and 2.108 for the Allison and Gorman, Gorsuch, White et al., Center et al., as well as for Huitema and McKean methods, respectively. A brief description of selected statistical programs available to conduct regression-based methods was given.