Standardized protocol for voiding cystourethrogram: Are recommendations being followed?. Issue 1 (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Janssen, Karmon M.; Kirsch, Andrew J.; Crisostomo-Wynne, Theodore C.; Leong, Traci; Cuda, Scott P.; Arlen, Angela M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric urology. Volume 17:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 66.e1
• Page End: 66.e6
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: Voiding cystourethrogram -- Vesicoureteral reflux -- Protocol; Pediatric urology -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Child; Infant; Urologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques; Appareil urinaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie; Urologie; Pediatric urology; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.926
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.10.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-5131

Abstract

Summary: Background: Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images the urethra and bladder during filling and emptying, as well as ureters and kidneys when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present, providing detailed information about both anatomical and functional status of the urinary tract. Given the importance of information obtained, and the varying quality depending on VCUG technique and radiology reporting, the American Academy of Pediatrics Sections on Urology and Radiology published a joint standardized VCUG protocol in 2016. Objective: We compared VCUG reports from multiple institutions before and after publication of the protocol to determine adherence to recommendations. Study Design: VCUG reports generated during two separate time periods were assessed – before and after publication – to evaluate impact of the protocol. Adherence to the reporting template was evaluated. Studies performed on patients >18 years of age and those obtained for trauma evaluation were excluded from study. Results: A total of 3121 VCUG reports were analyzed, 989 (31.7%) were generated before and 2132 (68.3%) after protocol publication. Comparing cohorts, there was no difference in gender (62.6% female versus 61.4%; p = 0.53) though children in the post-cohort were slightly older (3.34 ± 3.82 versus 3.68 ± 4.19 years; p = 0.03). A significant increase in scout image reporting (91.5%) and cyclic studies (20.5%) were observed in the post-cohort, in comparison to 79.2% and 13.1%, respectively, in the pre-protocol cohort (p < 0.001) [Figure]. Measured PVR and recorded infused volume actually decreased between study periods (84.7% vs 72.8% and 97.2% vs 91.5%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between VUR grade reporting (99.4 vs 98.5%, p = 0.25). Recorded volume in which reflux occurred increased between periods (0.6% vs 2.3%, p < 0.05), while reporting of filling vs voiding reflux decreased in the post-cohort (84.4% pre-vs 77.4% post-protocol, p < 0.008). Discussion: The 2016 VCUG protocol recommended inclusion of various data points, however the volume at which reflux occurs remained vastly underreported. Timing of reflux has been shown to predict likelihood of spontaneous resolution and risk of breakthrough urinary tract infection; thus, its omission may limit the information used to counsel families and provide individualized care. Conclusion: Despite consensus on standard VCUG protocol to best perform and record data, reports remain inconsistent. While VUR grade is routinely reported, other important anatomic and functional findings which are known to impact resolution and breakthrough urinary tract infection rates, such as volume at which reflux occurs, are consistently underreported. Summary Figure A significant increase in reporting of cyclic studies (20.5%) was observed in the post-cohort, in comparison to 13.1 in the pre-protocol cohort (p < 0.001). Summary Figure