Can States Continue to Set the Agenda for Tobacco 21? Insights From US News Coverage Between 2012 and 2020. Issue 8 (29th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hrywna, Mary; Singh, Binu; Wackowski, Olivia A; Hudson, Shawna V; Delnevo, Cristine D
• Is Part Of: Nicotine & tobacco research. Volume 24:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 1305
• Page End: 1309
• Publication Date: 2022-01-29
• Subjects: Nicotine -- Periodicals; Tobacco -- Research -- Periodicals; Tobacco habit -- Periodicals; Nicotine -- Periodicals; Tobacco -- Periodicals; Smoking -- Periodicals; 613.85
• DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-2203

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Existing research on media examining the news content related to Tobacco 21 (T21) predate the adoption of most T21 laws. This study examined the discussion of T21 laws in top-circulating print media sources in the United States between 2012 and 2020. Aims and Methods: Systematic database searches using Access World News and Factiva identified T21-related news articles appearing in the top daily circulating newspapers in each state between January 2012 and December 2020 ( n = 586 articles). Content analyses documented prevalence, types of articles and context related to framing of arguments for or against T21 laws. Results: Newspaper coverage of T21 was highest in 2019 (42.8% of articles). The majority were news or features (75.4%) followed by editorials or opinions (24.6%) which largely supported T21. Most articles focused on state or local T21 action. Coverage of federal T21 increased in 2019. The most common argument supporting T21 included reducing youth tobacco prevalence (64.8%) while the most frequent objection was freedom infringement (25.1%). Tobacco and vape industries began voicing support for T21 in 2019. Conclusions: News coverage of state-level T21 in the United States began to increase in 2015 and peaked in 2019 with enactment of federal T21, a newsworthy event. As states adopt and amend T21 laws to align with federal law, advocates can use media to help shape the narrative and encourage strong T21 policies. Implications: This study described the volume and content of T21 print media coverage from 2012 to 2020, including common arguments used to support and oppose T21. Arguments in support of T21 included reducing youth tobacco use, particularly use of e-cigarettes, and related health effects while arguments against T21 focused on individual rights. Support for T21 reached a tipping point in 2019, including the tobacco industry's reversal in opposing such laws. States can and should continue to improve existing T21 laws and policies and increase public awareness about critical policy components such as inspection procedures and penalties.