Transmission reduction, health benefits, and upper-bound costs of interventions to improve retention on antiretroviral therapy: a combined analysis of three mathematical models. Issue 9 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bershteyn, Anna; Jamieson, Lise; Kim, Hae-Young; Platais, Ingrida; Milali, Masabho P; Mudimu, Edinah; ten Brink, Debra; Martin-Hughes, Rowan; Kelly, Sherrie L; Phillips, Andrew N; Bansi-Matharu, Loveleen; Cambiano, Valentina; Revill, Paul; Meyer-Rath, Gesine; Nichols, Brooke E
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 10:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: e1298
• Page End: e1306
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: World health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00310-2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-109X

Abstract

Summary: Background: In this so-called treat-all era, antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruptions contribute to an increasing proportion of HIV infections and deaths. Many strategies to improve retention on ART cost more than standard of care. In this study, we aimed to estimate the upper-bound costs at which such interventions should be adopted. Methods: In this combined analysis, we compared the infections averted, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted, and upper-bound costs of interventions that improve ART retention in three HIV models with diverse structures, assumptions, and baseline settings: EMOD in South Africa, Optima in Malawi, and Synthesis in sub-Saharan African low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We modelled estimates over a 40-year time horizon, from a baseline of Jan 1, 2022, when interventions would be implemented, to Jan 1, 2062. We varied increment of ART retention (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% retention), the extent to which interventions could be targeted towards individuals at risk of interrupting ART, and cost-effectiveness thresholds in each setting. Findings: Despite simulating different settings and epidemic trends, all three models produced consistent estimates of health benefit (ie, DALYs averted) and transmission reduction per increment in retention. The range of estimates was 1·35–3·55 DALYs and 0·12–0·20 infections averted over the 40-year time horizon per additional person-year retained on ART. Upper-bound costs varied by setting and intervention effectiveness. Improving retention by 25% among all people receiving ART, regardless of risk of ART interruption, gave an upper-bound cost per person-year of US$2–6 in Optima (Malawi), $43–68 in Synthesis (LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa), and $28–180 in EMOD (South Africa). A maximally targeted and effective retention intervention had an upper-bound cost per person-year of US$93–223 in Optima (Malawi), $871–1389 in Synthesis (LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa), and $1013–6518 in EMOD (South Africa). Interpretation: Upper-bound costs that could improve ART retention vary across sub-Saharan African settings and are likely to be similar to or higher than was estimated before the start of the treat-all era. Upper-bound costs could be increased by targeting interventions to those most at risk of interrupting ART. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.