Effectiveness of Quickcast Versus Custom-Fabricated Thermoplastic Orthosis Immobilization for the Treatment of Mallet Fingers: A Randomized Clinical Trial. (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cavanaugh, Priscilla K.; Watkins, Cynthia; Jones, Christopher; Maltenfort, Mitchell G.; Beredjiklian, Pedro K.; Rivlin, Michael
• Is Part Of: Hand. Volume 17:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: 1090
• Page End: 1097
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: mallet finger -- extension splinting -- tendinous mallet finger -- swan-neck deformity -- extensor droop; Hand -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Hand -- Surgery; Periodicals; 617.57005
• DOI: 10.1177/1558944720988136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1558-9447

Abstract

Background: Mallet finger is a common injury involving a detachment of the terminal extensor tendon from the distal phalanx. This injury is usually treated with immobilization in a cast or splint. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of mallet fingers treated with either a cast (Quickcast) or a traditional thermoplastic custom-fabricated orthosis. Methods: Our study was a prospective, assessor-blinded, single-center randomized clinical trial of 58 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of bony or soft tissue mallet finger treated with immobilization. Patients were randomized to either an orfilight thermoplastic custom-fabricated orthosis or a Quickcast orthosis. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, and 10 weeks for bony and 4, 8, and 12 weeks for soft tissue mallets. Skin complications, pain with orthosis, compliance, need for surgical intervention, and extensor lag were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Both bony and soft tissue mallet finger patients experienced significantly less skin complications (33% vs 64%) and pain (11.2 vs 21.6) when using Quickcast versus an orfilight thermoplastic custom-fabricated orthosis. The soft tissue mallet group revealed a greater difference in pain, favoring Quickcast (6.2 vs 22). No significant difference in final extensor droop or need for secondary surgery was found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Quickcast immobilization for the treatment of mallet finger demonstrated fewer skin complications and less pain compared with orfilight custom-fabricated splints.