Comparison of chloride permeability methods for Alkali-Activated concrete. (20th March 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of chloride permeability methods for Alkali-Activated concrete. (20th March 2018)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of chloride permeability methods for Alkali-Activated concrete
- Authors:
- Thomas, R.J.
Ariyachandra, Erandi
Lezama, Diego
Peethamparan, Sulapha - Abstract:
- Highlights: We compare chloride permeability tests for alkali-activated concrete. High pore solution conductivity causes problems with electrical methods. Resistivity and RCPT work but classifications should be changed. Abstract: This paper presents the results of an experimental study of chloride permeability in alkali-activated fly ash, alkali-activated slag, and Portland cement concrete. Test methods include the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), AC and DC electrical resistivity, and the 90-day salt ponding test. We hypothesize that differences in pore solution chemistry between alkali-activated and Portland cement binders render electrical methods unable to accurately estimate chloride permeability in alkali-activated concrete. The present study seeks to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing results from electrical tests with diffusion coefficients from salt ponding tests. Contrary to previous claims, the RCPT provided a good estimate of chloride permeability in both alkali-activated slag and alkali-activated fly ash concrete. RCPT results showed excellent correlation with diffusion coefficients determined from salt ponding tests. Resistivity-measurements exhibited poor correlation to diffusion coefficients and overestimated the resistance to chloride ion penetration. Furthermore, AC and DC resistivity measurements showed significant disagreement for alkali-activated concrete. Finally, evidence form salt ponding tests suggests differences in chloride bindingHighlights: We compare chloride permeability tests for alkali-activated concrete. High pore solution conductivity causes problems with electrical methods. Resistivity and RCPT work but classifications should be changed. Abstract: This paper presents the results of an experimental study of chloride permeability in alkali-activated fly ash, alkali-activated slag, and Portland cement concrete. Test methods include the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), AC and DC electrical resistivity, and the 90-day salt ponding test. We hypothesize that differences in pore solution chemistry between alkali-activated and Portland cement binders render electrical methods unable to accurately estimate chloride permeability in alkali-activated concrete. The present study seeks to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing results from electrical tests with diffusion coefficients from salt ponding tests. Contrary to previous claims, the RCPT provided a good estimate of chloride permeability in both alkali-activated slag and alkali-activated fly ash concrete. RCPT results showed excellent correlation with diffusion coefficients determined from salt ponding tests. Resistivity-measurements exhibited poor correlation to diffusion coefficients and overestimated the resistance to chloride ion penetration. Furthermore, AC and DC resistivity measurements showed significant disagreement for alkali-activated concrete. Finally, evidence form salt ponding tests suggests differences in chloride binding potential between alkali-activated and Portland cement concretes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Construction & building materials. Volume 165(2018)
- Journal:
- Construction & building materials
- Issue:
- Volume 165(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 165, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 165
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0165-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 104
- Page End:
- 111
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03-20
- Subjects:
- Alkali-activated concrete -- Chloride permeability -- Diffusion coefficient -- Salt ponding
Building materials -- Periodicals
624.18 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09500618 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0950-0618
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3420.950900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23545.xml