Second primary breast cancer after unilateral mastectomy alone or with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. (12th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agarwal, Shailesh; Pappas, Lisa; Matsen, Cindy B.; Agarwal, Jayant P.
• Is Part Of: Cancer medicine. Volume 9:Number 21(2020)
• Page Start: 8043
• Page End: 8052
• Publication Date: 2020-09-12
• Subjects: breast cancer -- contralateral prophylactic mastectomy -- CPM -- SEER -- survival -- unilateral mastectomy; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3394
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7634

Abstract

Abstract: Background: An increasing number of patients undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral breast cancer. However, the benefit of CPM has not been quantified in the setting of contemporary breast cancer therapy. Methods: We performed an analysis of 180 068 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, diagnosed with unilateral ductal breast carcinoma between 1998 and 2013 and treated with unilateral mastectomy (UM) or CPM. UM was performed in 146 213 patients (81.2%); CPM was performed in 33 855 patients (19.8%). Primary outcome of interest was cumulative incidence of a second primary breast cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast greater than 3 months after initial diagnosis. Cumulative incidence analysis was based on a Cox proportional model to generate curves of second primary breast cancer in any breast, ipsilateral breast only, or contralateral breast only. Results: Patients who underwent CPM had a significantly reduced incidence of second primary breast cancer 10 and 15 years after surgery (CPM 0.93% [0.73%, 1.12%] vs UM 4.44% [4.28%, 4.60%]). Patients who underwent CPM had significantly lower adjusted hazard of second primary breast cancer when compared with UM (HR 0.38 vs 1.0, P < .0001). Conclusions: CPM offers some protection from a second primary breast cancer, attributable to a reduced incidence in the contralateral breast. These findings provide additional information to providers and patients as they make decisions regarding surgical management. They should also be interpreted in the context of the absolute incidence of second primary breast cancer after UM and previous literature demonstrating no survival benefit. Abstract : We examine second primary breast cancer in the setting of unilateral or bilateral mastectomy using a population‐level database. Our results show that although patients with bilateral mastectomy have reduced odds of second primary breast cancer, this must be interpreted in the context of an overall low rate of second primary breast cancer.