Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry. (8th June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry. (8th June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry
- Authors:
- Toledano Delgado, Rafael
García‐Morales, Irene
Parejo‐Carbonell, Beatriz
Jiménez‐Huete, Adolfo
Herrera‐Ramirez, David
González‐Hernández, Ayoze
Ayuga Loro, Fernando
Santamarina, Estevo
Toledo, Manuel
Ojeda, Joaquín
Poza, Juan José
Molins, Albert
Giner, Pau
Estévez María, José Carlos
Castro‐Vilanova, María Dolores
Zurita, Jorge
Saiz‐Diaz, Rosa Ana
Gómez‐Ibañez, Asier
Rodriguez‐Uranga, Juan
Gil‐Nagel, Antonio
Campos, Dulce
Sánchez‐Larsen, Álvaro
Aguilar‐Amat Prior, Maria José
Mauri Llerda, José Angel
Huertas González, Nuria
García‐Barragán, Nuria - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure‐free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow‐up. Results: A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1‐57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2‐10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow‐up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log‐rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3‐26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure‐free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% atAbstract: Objective: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure‐free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow‐up. Results: A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1‐57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2‐10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow‐up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log‐rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3‐26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure‐free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow‐up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1‐8.33, P = .046). Significance: PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Epilepsia. Volume 61:issue 6(2020)
- Journal:
- Epilepsia
- Issue:
- Volume 61:issue 6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0061-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1109
- Page End:
- 1119
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06-08
- Subjects:
- effectiveness -- epilepsy -- monotherapy -- perampanel -- tolerability
Epilepsy -- Periodicals
616.853 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=epi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/epi.16548 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0013-9580
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3793.700000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23520.xml