Association between subfield volumes of the medial temporal lobe and cognitive assessments. Issue 6 (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ogawa, Masayo; Sone, Daichi; Beheshti, Iman; Maikusa, Norihide; Okita, Kyoji; Takano, Harumasa; Matsuda, Hiroshi
• Is Part Of: Heliyon. Volume 5:Issue 6(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: Medical imaging -- Alzheimer's disease -- Mild cognitive impairment -- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Hippocampal subfields -- Cognitive assessments; Research -- Periodicals; Medical sciences -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; Physical sciences -- Periodicals; 507.2
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01828
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-8440

Abstract

Abstract: Cognitive assessments and neuroimaging are routinely combined in clinical practice to diagnose dementia represented by Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is reported to be more suitable than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for screening mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild AD. On the other hand, attention to the subfield volumes of the medial temporal lobe has recently been considered important for the differential diagnosis and early detection of AD. The aim of this study was to uncover which specific hippocampal subfields and adjacent extrahippocampal structures contribute to deficits in cognitive assessment scores in patients with MCI and AD. We recruited from our institute 31 Japanese patients—14 with amnestic MCI and 17 with probable AD, with a clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0.5 and 1, respectively—and 50 healthy elderly individuals with a CDR of 0. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive assessments with the MMSE, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory I and II, and Japanese version of the MoCA (MoCA-J). With adjustment for age and sex, we performed partial correlation analysis of the cognitive assessment scores with the subfield volumes of the medial temporal lobe measured by software-mediated automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields using high-resolution T1-and T2-weighted images. Compared with normal controls, patients with MCI and AD showed subfield volume reductions in cornu ammonis (CA) 1, CA2, Brodmann area (BA) 35, BA36, the dentate gyrus (DG), the subiculum, and the entorhinal cortex (ERC). All participants showed high correlation coefficients (above 0.6) between cognitive assessment scores and subfield volumes in CA1, the DG, the subiculum, the ERC, and BA36. In patients with MCI and AD, the MoCA-J showed higher correlations than the MMSE with subfield volumes in CA1, the DG, the subiculum, and the ERC. These results suggest that the combination of the in vivo analysis of subfield morphometry of the medial temporal lobe with the MoCA-J paradigm provides important insights into whether changes within specific subfields are related to the cognitive profile in MCI and AD.