840 How did the first covid-19 lockdown affect general practitioner contacts with children and young people?. (17th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Foley, Kimberley; Maile, Edward; Bottle, Alex; Neale, Francesca; Viner, Russell; Kenny, Simon; Majeed, Azeem; Hargreaves, Dougal; Saxena, Sonia
• Is Part Of: Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 107(2022)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A60
• Page End: A61
• Publication Date: 2022-08-17
• Subjects: Children -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 618.920005
• DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-rcpch.99
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-9888

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: To examine the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on total, face to face and remote general practitioner (GP) contacts with children and young people aged under 25 years in England before and after the first lockdown in the United Kingdom (March to June 2020). Methods: Longitudinal trends analysis using electronic health records from the nationally representative Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database. We included all children and young people aged <25 years registered with a GP anytime during the study period (January 2015 to October 2020). We assigned their GP contacts according to their age (years) on the date of the contact: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, 20-24. Our main outcomes were total, face-to-face and remote weekly contacts with a GP. Secondary outcomes were weekly contacts with GPs for respiratory illnesses (upper respiratory tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections and asthma) and common non-transmissible conditions (urinary tract infections, diabetes, epilepsy and appendicitis). For all outcomes, we compared the number of contacts during the first UK lockdown (March to June 2020) with the mean number of contacts for comparable weeks from 2015 to 2019. Results: Our study population included 4 307 120 million children and young people who had 47 607 765 GP contacts. Total GP contacts fell by 40.7% (95% CI: 40.7, 40.8) during the first lockdown compared with previous years. Children aged 1-14 years had greater falls in total contacts (>50%) compared with infants and those aged 15-24 years. Face-to-face contacts fell by 88.3% (95% CI: 88.2, 88.4) for all ages. The greatest falls in face-to-face contacts occurred among children aged 1-14 (> 90%), whereas face-to-face contacts with infants fell by 76.8% (95% CI: 76.6, 77.0). Remote contacts more than doubled, increasing most in infants (over 2.5 fold). Total contacts for respiratory illnesses fell by 74% whereas contacts for common non-transmissible conditions shifted largely to remote and fell by 31%. Conclusion: Children and young people's contact with GPs fell, particularly for face-to-face assessment during the first pandemic lockdown, with notably fewer contacts for respiratory illnesses. This change reflects a combination of altered healthcare seeking behaviour, lower prevalence of some conditions (notably fewer respiratory illnesses due to fewer social contacts), and changes in service provision. A major shift from face-to-face to remote contacts for common non-transmissible conditions mitigated overall falls.