On the Estimation of Heritability with Family-Based and Population-Based Samples. (3rd August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Youngdoe; Lee, Young; Lee, Sungyoung; Kim, Nam Hee; Lim, Jeongmin; Kim, Young Jin; Oh, Ji Hee; Min, Haesook; Lee, Meehee; Seo, Hyeon-Jeong; Lee, So-Hyun; Sung, Joohon; Cho, Nam H.; Kim, Bong-Jo; Han, Bok-Ghee; Elston, Robert C.; Won, Sungho; Lee, Juyoung
• Other Names: Steen Kristel van Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: BioMed research international. Volume 2015(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-08-03
• Subjects: Medicine -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Biotechnology -- Periodicals; Life sciences -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1155/2015/671349
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2314-6133

Abstract

Abstract : For a family-based sample, the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix can be parameterized to include the variance of a polygenic effect that has then been estimated using a variance component analysis. However, with the advent of large-scale genomic data, the genetic relationship matrix (GRM) can be estimated and can be utilized to parameterize the variance of a polygenic effect for population-based samples. Therefore narrow sense heritability, which is both population and trait specific, can be estimated with both population- and family-based samples. In this study we estimate heritability from both family-based and population-based samples, collected in Korea, and the heritability estimates from the pooled samples were, for height, 0.60; body mass index (BMI), 0.32; log-transformed triglycerides (log TG), 0.24; total cholesterol (TCHL), 0.30; high-density lipoprotein (HDL), 0.38; low-density lipoprotein (LDL), 0.29; systolic blood pressure (SBP), 0.23; and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 0.24. Furthermore, we found differences in how heritability is estimated—in particular the amount of variance attributable to common environment in twins can be substantial—which indicates heritability estimates should be interpreted with caution.