Analysis of the effects of spatiotemporal demand data aggregation methods on distance and volume errors. Issue 1 (10th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hornberger, Zachary; Cox, Bruce; Hill, Raymond R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of defense analytics and logistics. Volume 5:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2021-05-10
• Subjects: Modifiable areal unit problem -- Zone definition problem -- Aggregation error -- Spatiotemporal demand data -- Search and rescue -- Aggregation error; Military art and science -- Periodicals; Military research -- Periodicals; Defense industries -- Periodicals; Logistics -- Periodicals; 355.4
• DOI: 10.1108/JDAL-03-2020-0003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-6439

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Large/stochastic spatiotemporal demand data sets can prove intractable for location optimization problems, motivating the need for aggregation. However, demand aggregation induces errors. Significant theoretical research has been performed related to the modifiable areal unit problem and the zone definition problem. Minimal research has been accomplished related to the specific issues inherent to spatiotemporal demand data, such as search and rescue (SAR) data. This study provides a quantitative comparison of various aggregation methodologies and their relation to distance and volume based aggregation errors. Design/methodology/approach: This paper introduces and applies a framework for comparing both deterministic and stochastic aggregation methods using distance- and volume-based aggregation error metrics. This paper additionally applies weighted versions of these metrics to account for the reality that demand events are nonhomogeneous. These metrics are applied to a large, highly variable, spatiotemporal demand data set of SAR events in the Pacific Ocean. Comparisons using these metrics are conducted between six quadrat aggregations of varying scales and two zonal distribution models using hierarchical clustering. Findings: As quadrat fidelity increases the distance-based aggregation error decreases, while the two deliberate zonal approaches further reduce this error while using fewer zones. However, the higher fidelity aggregations detrimentally affect volume error. Additionally, by splitting the SAR data set into training and test sets this paper shows the stochastic zonal distribution aggregation method is effective at simulating actual future demands. Originality/value: This study indicates no singular best aggregation method exists, by quantifying trade-offs in aggregation-induced errors practitioners can utilize the method that minimizes errors most relevant to their study. Study also quantifies the ability of a stochastic zonal distribution method to effectively simulate future demand data.