Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Using "Elevate Anterior" versus "Perigee" System Devices for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (29th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Using "Elevate Anterior" versus "Perigee" System Devices for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (29th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Using "Elevate Anterior" versus "Perigee" System Devices for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Authors:
- Long, Cheng-Yu
Wang, Chiu-Lin
Wu, Ming-Ping
Wu, Chin-Hu
Lin, Kun-Ling
Liu, Cheng-Min
Tsai, Eing-Mei
Shen, Ching-Ju - Other Names:
- Rimbach Stefan Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes using the Perigee versus Elevate anterior devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Study Design. One hundred and forty-one women with POP stages II to IV were scheduled for either Perigee (n = 91 ) or Elevate anterior device (n = 50 ). Preoperative and postoperative assessments included pelvic examination, urodynamic study, and a personal interview about quality of life and urinary symptoms. Results. Despite postoperative point C of Elevate group being significantly deeper than the Perigee group (median: −7.5 versus −6; P < 0.01 ), the 1-year success rates for two groups were comparable (P > 0.05 ). Apart from urgency incontinence, women with advanced POP experienced significant resolution of irritating and obstructive symptoms after both procedures (P < 0.05 ), generating the improvement in postoperative scores of Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) (P < 0.01 ). On urodynamics, only the residual urine decreased significantly following these two procedures (P < 0.05 ). Women undergoing Perigee mesh experienced significantly higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and vaginal extrusion rates compared with the Elevate anterior procedure (P < 0.05 ). Conclusions. With comparable success rates, the Elevate procedure has advantages over the Perigee surgery with lower extrusion rate and postoperative day 1 VAS scores.
- Is Part Of:
- BioMed research international. Volume 2015(2015)
- Journal:
- BioMed research international
- Issue:
- Volume 2015(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2015, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 2015
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-2015-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-29
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Biology -- Periodicals
Biotechnology -- Periodicals
Life sciences -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1155/2015/479610 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2314-6133
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 23478.xml