'Strange multiplicity' as a moral-political value: Potential and costs of normativity in world politics. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Royer, Christof
• Is Part Of: Journal of international political theory. Volume 18:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 336
• Page End: 354
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: International Political Theory -- James Tully -- moral-political value -- potential and costs -- strange multiplicity; Political science -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 320.01105
• DOI: 10.1177/17550882221080563
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-0882

Abstract

Recent International Relations (IR) scholarship has identified 'societal multiplicity' as the ontological concept that gives IR its identity as an academic discipline. My article, by contrast, addresses the question: What are the consequences, that is, the positive potential and the necessary costs, of understanding multiplicity as a moral-political value in world politics? The question is important because, in contrast to the focus on multiplicity as the ontology of IR, it allows us to develop a more radically democratic idea of multiplicity as a value in world politics. To address this question, I will bring Rosenberg's conception of societal multiplicity into conversation with the radically democratic idea of Tully's 'strange multiplicity' and draw out the consequences of such a normative turn. My argument is that while Rosenberg does not frame multiplicity as a value, Tully's normative understanding of the concept harbours enormous potential to transform oppressive and dominating practices in world politics. However, I will also show that Tully's general rejection of all forms of domination comes at a price that must not be underestimated. It is of crucial importance to get a clear picture of these consequences as we must decide whether or not this price is, ultimately, worth paying.