Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup. (24th July 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup. (24th July 2017)
- Main Title:
- Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup
- Authors:
- Rager, Olivier
Nkoulou, René
Exquis, Nadia
Garibotto, Valentina
Tabouret-Viaud, Claire
Zaidi, Habib
Amzalag, Gaël
Lee-Felker, Stephanie Anne
Zilli, Thomas
Ratib, Osman - Other Names:
- Ogawa Kazuma Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose . The use of SPECT/CT in bone scans has been widespread in recent years, but there are no specific guidelines concerning the optimal acquisition protocol. Two strategies have been proposed: targeted SPECT/CT for equivocal lesions detected on planar images or systematic whole-body SPECT/CT. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two approaches. Methods . 212 consecutive patients with a history of cancer were referred for bone scans to detect bone metastases. Two experienced readers randomly evaluated for each patient either planar images with one-field SPECT/CT targeted on equivocal focal uptakes (targeted SPECT/CT) or a whole-body (two-field) SPECT/CT acquisition from the base of the skull to the proximal femurs (whole-body SPECT/CT). The exams were categorized as "nonmetastatic, " "equivocal, " or "metastatic" on both protocols. The presence or absence of any extra-axial skeletal lesions was also assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of both strategies were measured using the results of subsequent imaging follow-up as the reference standard. Results . Whole-body SPECT/CT had a significantly higher sensitivity than targeted SPECT/CT to detect bone metastases ( p = 0.0297 ) and to detect extra-axial metastases ( p = 0.0266 ) . There was no significant difference in specificity among the two approaches. Conclusion . Whole-body SPECT/CT is the optimal modality of choice for metastatic workup, including detection of extra-axial lesions, withAbstract : Purpose . The use of SPECT/CT in bone scans has been widespread in recent years, but there are no specific guidelines concerning the optimal acquisition protocol. Two strategies have been proposed: targeted SPECT/CT for equivocal lesions detected on planar images or systematic whole-body SPECT/CT. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two approaches. Methods . 212 consecutive patients with a history of cancer were referred for bone scans to detect bone metastases. Two experienced readers randomly evaluated for each patient either planar images with one-field SPECT/CT targeted on equivocal focal uptakes (targeted SPECT/CT) or a whole-body (two-field) SPECT/CT acquisition from the base of the skull to the proximal femurs (whole-body SPECT/CT). The exams were categorized as "nonmetastatic, " "equivocal, " or "metastatic" on both protocols. The presence or absence of any extra-axial skeletal lesions was also assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of both strategies were measured using the results of subsequent imaging follow-up as the reference standard. Results . Whole-body SPECT/CT had a significantly higher sensitivity than targeted SPECT/CT to detect bone metastases ( p = 0.0297 ) and to detect extra-axial metastases ( p = 0.0266 ) . There was no significant difference in specificity among the two approaches. Conclusion . Whole-body SPECT/CT is the optimal modality of choice for metastatic workup, including detection of extra-axial lesions, with improved sensitivity and similar specificity compared to targeted SPECT/CT. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BioMed research international. Volume 2017(2017)
- Journal:
- BioMed research international
- Issue:
- Volume 2017(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2017, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 2017
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-2017-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-07-24
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Biology -- Periodicals
Biotechnology -- Periodicals
Life sciences -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1155/2017/7039406 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2314-6133
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 23449.xml