Reduced All‐Cause Mortality With Bisphosphonates Among Post‐Fracture Osteoporosis Patients: A Nationwide Study and Systematic Review. Issue 3 (4th June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reduced All‐Cause Mortality With Bisphosphonates Among Post‐Fracture Osteoporosis Patients: A Nationwide Study and Systematic Review. Issue 3 (4th June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Reduced All‐Cause Mortality With Bisphosphonates Among Post‐Fracture Osteoporosis Patients: A Nationwide Study and Systematic Review
- Authors:
- Hsu, Yu‐Hsuan
Li, Chia‐Chun
Liang, Fu‐Wen
Peng, Zi‐Yang
Chang, Yin‐Fan
Hsu, Jason C.
Ou, Huang‐Tz
Wu, Chih‐Hsing - Abstract:
- Abstract : We assessed the survival outcomes associated with real‐world bisphosphonate use, stratified by fracture site, type, administration, and duration of treatment, among patients with osteoporosis. A systematic review that incorporates our findings was conducted to provide up‐to‐date evidence on survival outcomes with bisphosphonate treatment in real‐world settings. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis who had been hospitalized for major fractures were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database 2008–2017 and followed until 2018. There were 24, 390 new bisphosphonate users who were classified and compared with 76, 725 nonusers of anti‐osteoporosis medications in terms of survival outcomes using Cox model analysis. An inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox model and landmark analyses for minimizing immortal time bias were also performed. Bisphosphonate users vs. nonusers had a significantly lower mortality risk, regardless of fracture site (hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for patients with any major fracture, hip fracture, and vertebral fracture: 0.90 (0.88, 0.93), 0.83 (0.80, 0.86), and 0.86 (0.82, 0.89), respectively). Compared with nonuse, zoledronic acid (0.77 (0.73, 0.82)) was associated with the lowest mortality, followed by ibandronate (0.85 (0.78, 0.93)) and alendronate/risedronate (0.93 (0.91, 0.96)). Using bisphosphonates for ≥ 3 years had lower mortality (0.60 (0.53, 0.67)) than using bisphosphonates for < 3 yearsAbstract : We assessed the survival outcomes associated with real‐world bisphosphonate use, stratified by fracture site, type, administration, and duration of treatment, among patients with osteoporosis. A systematic review that incorporates our findings was conducted to provide up‐to‐date evidence on survival outcomes with bisphosphonate treatment in real‐world settings. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis who had been hospitalized for major fractures were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database 2008–2017 and followed until 2018. There were 24, 390 new bisphosphonate users who were classified and compared with 76, 725 nonusers of anti‐osteoporosis medications in terms of survival outcomes using Cox model analysis. An inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox model and landmark analyses for minimizing immortal time bias were also performed. Bisphosphonate users vs. nonusers had a significantly lower mortality risk, regardless of fracture site (hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for patients with any major fracture, hip fracture, and vertebral fracture: 0.90 (0.88, 0.93), 0.83 (0.80, 0.86), and 0.86 (0.82, 0.89), respectively). Compared with nonuse, zoledronic acid (0.77 (0.73, 0.82)) was associated with the lowest mortality, followed by ibandronate (0.85 (0.78, 0.93)) and alendronate/risedronate (0.93 (0.91, 0.96)). Using bisphosphonates for ≥ 3 years had lower mortality (0.60 (0.53, 0.67)) than using bisphosphonates for < 3 years (0.98 (0.95, 1.01)). Intravenous bisphosphonates had a lower mortality than that of oral bisphosphonates. Our results are consistent with the systematic review findings among real‐world populations. In conclusion, bisphosphonate use, especially persistence to intravenous bisphosphonates (e.g., zoledronic acid), may reduce post‐fracture mortality among patients with osteoporosis, particularly those with hip/vertebral fractures. This supports the rational use of bisphosphonates in post‐fracture care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 112:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 112:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 112, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0112-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 711
- Page End:
- 719
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-04
- Subjects:
- Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Therapeutics -- Periodicals
615.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/clpt/index.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-6535 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.mosby.com/cpt ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099236 ↗
http://www2.us.elsevierhealth.com/scripts/om.dll/serve?action=searchDB&searchdbfor=home&id=cp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cpt.2645 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9236
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.330000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23436.xml