On Which Microphysical Time Scales to Use in Studies of Entrainment‐Mixing Mechanisms in Clouds. Issue 7 (13th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lu, Chunsong; Liu, Yangang; Zhu, Bin; Yum, Seong Soo; Krueger, Steven K.; Qiu, Yujun; Niu, Shengjie; Luo, Shi
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 123:Issue 7(2018)
• Page Start: 3740
• Page End: 3756
• Publication Date: 2018-04-13
• Subjects: entrainment‐mixing -- clouds -- time scales -- observation -- simulation; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027985
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: The commonly used time scales in entrainment‐mixing studies are examined to seek the most appropriate one, based on aircraft observations of cumulus clouds from the RACORO campaign and numerical simulations with the Explicit Mixing Parcel Model. The time scales include the following: τ evap, the time for droplet complete evaporation; τ phase, the time for saturation ratio deficit ( S ) to reach 1/ e of its initial value; τ satu, the time for S to reach −0.5%; and τ react, the time for complete droplet evaporation or S to reach −0.5%. It is found that the proper time scale to use depends on the specific objectives of entrainment‐mixing studies. First, if the focus is on the variations of liquid water content (LWC) and S, then τ react for saturation, τ satu and τ phase are almost equivalently appropriate, because they all represent the rate of dry air reaching saturation or of LWC decrease. Second, if one focuses on the variations of droplet size and number concentration, τ react for complete evaporation and τ evap are proper because they characterize how fast droplets evaporate and whether number concentration decreases. Moreover, τ react for complete evaporation and τ evap are always positively correlated with homogeneous mixing degree ( ψ ); thus, the two time scales, especially τ evap, are recommended for developing parameterizations. However, ψ and the other time scales can be negatively, positively, or not correlated, depending on the dominant factors of the entrained air (i.e., relative humidity or aerosols). Third, all time scales are proportional to each other under certain microphysical and thermodynamic conditions. Key Points: The proper time scales to use depend on the specific objectives of entrainment‐mixing studies and can be unified under certain conditions If one focuses on variations of liquid water content and saturation deficit, phase relaxation time and other two time scales are proper If one focuses on variations of droplet size and number concentration, droplet evaporation time and another related time scale are proper