Clinical efficacy and safety of robot assisted surgery for choledochal cysts excisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (3rd August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Xiong; Su, Yunan; Tian, Hongwei; Lu, Tingting; Gong, Shiyi; Miao, Changfeng; Song, Shaoming; Lei, Ting; Tan, Yangyang; Xu, Yongcheng; Huang, Xianbin; Yang, Kehu; Guo, Tiankang
• Is Part Of: Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. Volume 16:Number 8(2022)
• Page Start: 787
• Page End: 796
• Publication Date: 2022-08-03
• Subjects: Choledochal cysts -- laparoscopic procedures -- meta-analysis -- robot-assisted procedures; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.3
• DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2109464
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-4124

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and therapeutic effect of Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) for choledochal cysts (CCs) excisions. Research design and methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM were searched from database inception to 1 May 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to conduct quality assessments, and RevMan (Version 5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: In all, 9 studies, involving 623 patients, were analyzed. RAS compared with LAS was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter time to start solid diets, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups, but the total costs were higher in RAS. Our subgroup analysis showed that RAS had significant advantages over LAS in the child group: minor bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. Conclusions: The available evidence indicates that the RAS system has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, minor tissue damage, quick recovery, and sound healing in treating choledochal cyst, which proves that the RAS is safely feasible. Especially in children, RAS tends to be a better choice.