Breast Implant–Related Adverse Events During Mammography: An Assessment of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. Issue 3 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Normandin, Shanel; Safran, Tyler; Abi-Rafeh, Jad; Tremblay, Francine; Winocour, Sebastian J.; Chu, Carrie; Davison, Peter G.; Vorstenbosch, Joshua
• Is Part Of: Annals of plastic surgery. Volume 89:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 261
• Page End: 266
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: implants -- mammography -- rupture -- complications; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003243
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-7043

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Adverse events arising in patients with breast implants during mammography reported by the Food and Drug Administration include implant rupture, pain, and impaired visualization. However, data supporting these claims were collected in 2004, and since, newer implant generations have been developed with overall rate of implantation increasing by 48%. Objectives: This article aims to determine the current incidence of implant-related adverse events arising during mammography. Methods: We analyzed reports regarding silicone and saline breast implants published in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database between 2008 and November 2018. Search terms included "mammogram, " "mammography, " "radiograph, " "breast cancer screening, " "breast cancer test, " and "x-ray." Results: Of the 20 539 implant-related adverse events available in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database, 427 were retrieved using our search strategy and 41 were related to mammography. Thirty-five of identified cases (85.4%) reported implant rupture, of which 19 (54.3%) were confirmed by a healthcare professional, 9 (25.7%) were clinically confirmed by saline implant deflation, and 7 (20.0%) were unverified reports by patients. Sixteen ruptures (45.7%) occurred with silicone implants, whereas 19 ruptures (54.3%) occurred with saline. Other adverse events included pain (29.3%), change in implant appearance (14.6%), and swelling (7.3%). Conclusions: Although implant rupture, pain, change in implant appearance, and swelling may occur, minimal implant-related adverse events arise during mammography. Given the extremely low reported risk of implant rupture, this should neither prevent patients from adhering to breast cancer screening programs nor deter patients from seeking breast implants. Patients should be aware of these reported risks and discuss screening options with their breast cancer screening team.