Comparison of 2D versus M-mode echocardiography for assessing fetal myocardial wall thickness. (18th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sepúlveda-Martínez, Alvaro; García-Otero, Laura; Soveral, Iris; Guirado, Laura; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, Brenda; Torres, Ximena; Rodriguez-Lopez, Mérida; Gratacos, Eduard; Gómez, Olga; Crispi, Fàtima
• Is Part Of: Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 32:Number 14(2019)
• Page Start: 2319
• Page End: 2327
• Publication Date: 2019-07-18
• Subjects: Reproducibility -- fetal heart -- echocardiography -- ultrasound -- comparison; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Perinatology -- Periodicals; Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neonatology -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1432041
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7058

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: M-mode and 2D have been proposed for evaluating fetal myocardial thickness. However, studies comparing the performance of both modalities are lacking. We aimed to compare 2D versus M-mode reproducibility for assessing myocardial wall thicknesses. Methods: A prospective study including 45 healthy fetuses from low-risk pregnancies evaluated between 18 and 41 weeks of gestation. Left and right ventricular free-wall and septal myocardial thicknesses were measured at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) in transverse 4-chamber view using 2D and M-mode. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was evaluated by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Both techniques were compared by t -test of the CCC. Results: 2D and M-mode demonstrated excellent and similar intraobserver repeatability, with the best concordance in ES septal thickness (M-mode CCC 0.956 versus 2D-mode CCC 0.914). Interobserver reproducibility demonstrated also a high concordance, optimal in ES left ventricular free wall (M-mode 0.925 versus 2 D 0.855). Comparison of both techniques demonstrated a high concordance in all measurements, except for ED septal thickness with better reproducibility using M-mode (CCC 0.954 versus 0.847, p = .017). Conclusions: 2D and M-mode can be used in a reproducible manner for measuring fetal myocardial thickness, with a slightly better performance of M-mode for assessing ED septal wall thickness.