Machine-learning, MRI bone shape and important clinical outcomes in osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Issue 4 (13th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bowes, Michael A.; Kacena, Katherine; Alabas, Oras A.; Brett, Alan D.; Dube, Bright; Bodick, Neil; Conaghan, Philip G
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 80:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 502
• Page End: 508
• Publication Date: 2020-11-13
• Subjects: osteoarthritis -- magnetic resonance imaging -- knee osteoarthritis; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) structural status is imperfectly classified using radiographic assessment. Statistical shape modelling (SSM), a form of machine-learning, provides precise quantification of a characteristic 3D OA bone shape. We aimed to determine the benefits of this novel measure of OA status for assessing risks of clinically important outcomes. Methods: The study used 4796 individuals from the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort. SSM-derived femur bone shape (B-score) was measured from all 9433 baseline knee MRIs. We examined the relationship between B-score, radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) and current and future pain and function as well as total knee replacement (TKR) up to 8 years. Results: B-score repeatability supported 40 discrete grades. KLG and B-score were both associated with risk of current and future pain, functional limitation and TKR; logistic regression curves were similar. However, each KLG included a wide range of B-scores. For example, for KLG3, risk of pain was 34.4 (95% CI 31.7 to 37.0)%, but B-scores within KLG3 knees ranged from 0 to 6; for B-score 0, risk was 17.0 (16.1 to 17.9)% while for B-score 6, it was 52.1 (48.8 to 55.4)%. For TKR, KLG3 risk was 15.3 (13.3 to 17.3)%; while B-score 0 had negligible risk, B-score 6 risk was 35.6 (31.8 to 39.6)%. Age, sex and body mass index had negligible effects on association between B-score and symptoms. Conclusions: B-score provides reader-independent quantification using a single time-point, providing unambiguous OA status with defined clinical risks across the whole range of disease including pre-radiographic OA. B-score heralds a step-change in OA stratification for interventions and improved personalised assessment, analogous to the T-score in osteoporosis.