Influences of pH and substrate supply on the ratio of iron to sulfate reduction. Issue 4 (2nd May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paper, Janet M.; Flynn, Theodore M.; Boyanov, Maxim I.; Kemner, Kenneth M.; Haller, Ben R.; Crank, Kathleen; Lower, AnneMarie; Jin, Qusheng; Kirk, Matthew F.
• Is Part Of: Geobiology. Volume 19:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 405
• Page End: 420
• Publication Date: 2021-05-02
• Subjects: anoxic environments -- Geobacter -- goethite -- iron reduction -- sulfate reduction; Geobiology -- Periodicals; Biogeochemistry -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 551
• DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12444
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-4677

Abstract

Abstract: Iron reduction and sulfate reduction often occur simultaneously in anoxic systems, and where that is the case, the molar ratio between the reactions (i.e., Fe/SO4 2− reduced) influences their impact on water quality and carbon storage. Previous research has shown that pH and the supply of electron donors and acceptors affect that ratio, but it is unclear how their influences compare and affect one another. This study examines impacts of pH and the supply of acetate, sulfate, and goethite on the ratio of iron to sulfate reduction in semi‐continuous sediment bioreactors. We examined which parameter had the greatest impact on that ratio and whether the parameter influences depended on the state of each other. Results show that pH had a greater influence than acetate supply on the ratio of iron to sulfate reduction, and that the impact of acetate supply on the ratio depended on pH. In acidic reactors (pH 6.0 media), the ratio of iron to sulfate reduction decreased from 3:1 to 2:1 as acetate supply increased (0–1 mM). In alkaline reactors (pH 7.5 media), iron and sulfate were reduced in equal proportions, regardless of acetate supply. Secondly, a comparison of experiments with and without sulfate shows that the extent of iron reduction was greater if sulfate reduction was occurring and that the effect was larger in alkaline reactors than acidic reactors. Thus, the influence of sulfate supply on iron reduction extent also depended on pH and suggests that iron reduction grows more dependent on sulfate reduction as pH increases. Our results compare well to trends in groundwater geochemistry and provide further evidence that pH is a major control on iron and sulfate reduction in systems with crystalline (oxyhydr)oxides. pH not only affects the ratio between the reactions but also the influences of other parameters on that ratio.