Contingent negative variation: a biomarker of abnormal attention in functional movement disorders. (14th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Teodoro, T.; Koreki, A.; Meppelink, A. M.; Little, S.; Nielsen, G.; Macerollo, A.; Ferreira, J. J.; Pareés, I.; Lang, A.; Edwards, M. J.
• Is Part Of: European journal of neurology. Volume 27:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 985
• Page End: 994
• Publication Date: 2020-04-14
• Subjects: biomarkers -- functional neurological disorders -- functional movement disorders -- psychogenic disorders; Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ene.14189
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-5101

Abstract

Abstract : Background and purpose: Contingent negative variation (CNV) is a negative cortical wave that precedes a pre‐cued imperative stimulus requiring a quick motor response. It has been related to motor preparation and anticipatory attention. The aim was to ascertain whether the clinical improvement of functional movement disorders after physiotherapy would be associated with faster reaction times and modulation of CNV. Methods: Motor performance and CNV were analysed during a pre‐cued choice reaction time task with varying cue validity. Twenty‐one patients with functional movement disorders and 13 healthy controls at baseline were compared. Patients then underwent physiotherapy. At follow‐up after physiotherapy, patients were categorized as clinically improved (responders) or not improved (non‐responders) and retested. Results: At baseline, patients did not generate CNV, contrary to controls [mean amplitude (µV) at the end of preparation to move: patients −0.47 (95% CI −1.94, 1.00) versus controls −2.59 (95% CI −4.46, −0.72)]. Responders performed faster after physiotherapy [mean natural logarithm (ln) reaction time (RT) (ms): follow‐up 6.112 (95% CI 5.923, 6.301) versus baseline 6.206 (95% CI 6.019, 6.394), P = 0.010], contrary to non‐responders. Simultaneously, responders showed a recovery of CNV after physiotherapy [follow‐up −1.95 (95% CI −3.49, −0.41) versus baseline −0.19 (95% CI −1.73, 1.35), P < 0.001], contrary to non‐responders [follow‐up −0.32 (95% CI −1.79, 1.14) versus baseline −0.72 (95% CI −2.19, 0.75), P = 0.381]. Conclusions: Clinical improvement of functional movement disorders after physiotherapy was associated with faster reaction times and normalization of CNV, which was absent at baseline. These findings suggest that CNV may constitute a useful neurophysiological biomarker related to abnormal attention in functional movement disorders.