Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum liquid microsampling consortium: microsampling: assessing accuracy and precision of handheld pipettes and capillaries. (11th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hawthorne, Glen; Dillen, Lieve; Barfield, Matthew; Cobb, Zoe; Kandira, Abdullah; Schroeter, Katrin; White, Steve; Karp, Natasha A; Love, Iain; Boutet, Valerie; Rohde, Morten; Kranenborgh, Marion; Timmerman, Philip
• Is Part Of: Bioanalysis. Volume 11:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 533
• Page End: 542
• Publication Date: 2019-04-11
• Subjects: accuracy of pipetting -- EBF -- microsampling; Drugs -- Analysis -- Periodicals; 615.19005
• DOI: 10.4155/bio-2019-0018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-6180

Abstract

Aim: Microsampling in preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK) studies is currently widely adopted across the pharmaceutical industry.Materials & methods: The European Bioanalysis Forum liquid microsampling consortium member companies assessed the accuracy and precision of handheld pipettes and microcapillaries at volumes of less than 10 μl. The following key factors on pipetting performance were also evaluated: Pipette type (positive displacement, air displacement and microcapillary), experience of user and the liquid type. Water was selected as a best-case scenario for accuracy and precision determination and blood plasma as a 'real world' bioanalysis sample type.Conclusion: Accuracy and precision on the pipetted volume decreased at lower volumes and experienced laboratory technicians performed better compared with the infrequent users. With respect to the pipetting devices used, microcapillaries showed better or equivalent accuracy and precision compared with handheld pipettes across the volume range 1–8 μl independent of the matrix used.