Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?. (December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?. (December 2022)
- Main Title:
- Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?
- Authors:
- Sjöstedt, Martin
Sundström, Aksel
Jagers, Sverker C.
Ntuli, Herbert - Abstract:
- Highlights: Why do some locals choose to assist rangers and report on poachers, while others refrain from doing so? We surveyed residents in and near the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (GLTP) in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. People that are afraid of rangers and perceive them as corruptible are less willing to assist in information-sharing. Seeing poaching as condemnable increases people's propensity to report on illegal activities. To effectively involve locals in rule enforcement, policy needs to change how communities perceive both officials and rules. Abstract: Conservation rules – e.g. protected area regulations that aim to reduce wildlife poaching – often have an inherent challenge: while relying on that locals should share intelligence about observed crime to authorities, such rules tend to be weakly supported by these communities. Enforcement officials of conservation authorities (such as rangers) are seldom trusted, and this in turn raises doubts about whether locals will provide sufficient information about conservation crime, which is not the least needed in all those settings where a small number of rangers are tasked to monitor vast areas. The case of wildlife poaching in African countries illustrates this tension, where rangers are few, sometimes have a dubious record, and where offenders often are on good terms with locals. This article asks: Why do some locals choose to assist rangers and report on poachers, while others refrain from doing so? WeHighlights: Why do some locals choose to assist rangers and report on poachers, while others refrain from doing so? We surveyed residents in and near the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (GLTP) in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. People that are afraid of rangers and perceive them as corruptible are less willing to assist in information-sharing. Seeing poaching as condemnable increases people's propensity to report on illegal activities. To effectively involve locals in rule enforcement, policy needs to change how communities perceive both officials and rules. Abstract: Conservation rules – e.g. protected area regulations that aim to reduce wildlife poaching – often have an inherent challenge: while relying on that locals should share intelligence about observed crime to authorities, such rules tend to be weakly supported by these communities. Enforcement officials of conservation authorities (such as rangers) are seldom trusted, and this in turn raises doubts about whether locals will provide sufficient information about conservation crime, which is not the least needed in all those settings where a small number of rangers are tasked to monitor vast areas. The case of wildlife poaching in African countries illustrates this tension, where rangers are few, sometimes have a dubious record, and where offenders often are on good terms with locals. This article asks: Why do some locals choose to assist rangers and report on poachers, while others refrain from doing so? We conducted a survey in the years 2017–2018 directed towards 2300 residents in and near the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, where a major challenge is both subsistence and commercial forms of poaching. Our focus was primarily on subsistent poaching. We also conducted in-depth interviews with rangers and park officials to corroborate that our quantitative insights point to the same description of the situation. Our survey demonstrates that people that are afraid of rangers and perceive them as corruptible are less willing to assist in information-sharing. Seeing poaching as condemnable increases people's propensity to report on illegal activities. In contrast, individuals' stakes in conservation and perceptions of wildlife as threatened do not predict our outcome. Our findings suggest that to achieve a more thorough involvement of locals in the enforcement of conservation laws, policy needs to change how communities perceive both officials and rules. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- World development. Volume 160(2022)
- Journal:
- World development
- Issue:
- Volume 160(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 160, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 160
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0160-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12
- Subjects:
- Conservation -- Poaching -- Community involvement -- Africa -- Great Limpopo -- Protected areas -- Corruption
Economic history -- 1990- -- Periodicals
Economic assistance -- Developing countries -- Periodicals
330.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0305750X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106065 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0305-750X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9354.150000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23365.xml