Framing Australian Pleistocene coastal occupation and archaeology. (1st October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Framing Australian Pleistocene coastal occupation and archaeology. (1st October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Framing Australian Pleistocene coastal occupation and archaeology
- Authors:
- Ditchfield, Kane
Ulm, Sean
Manne, Tiina
Farr, Helen
O'Grady, Damien
Veth, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract: There are few archaeological sites that contain records for Pleistocene coastal occupation in Australia, as is the case globally. Two major viewpoints seek to explain why so few sites exist. The first is that the Pleistocene coast was a relatively marginal environment where fluctuating sea levels actively inhibited coastal resource productivity until the mid-to-late Holocene. The second position suggests that the Pleistocene coast (and its resources) was variably productive, potentially hosting extensive populations, but that the archaeological evidence for this occupation has been submerged by sea level rise. To help reconcile these perspectives in Australia, this paper provides a review, discussion, and assessment of the evidence for Australian Pleistocene coastal productivity and occupation. In doing so, we find no reason to categorically assume that coastal landscapes were ever unproductive or unoccupied. We demonstrate that the majority of Pleistocene coastal archaeology will be drowned where dense marine faunal assemblages should only be expected close to palaeo-shorelines. Mixed terrestrial and marine assemblages are likely to occur at sites located >2 km from Pleistocene shorelines. Ultimately, the discussions and arguments put forward in this paper provide a basic framework, and a different set of environmental expectations, within which to assess the results of independent coastal research. Highlights: Addresses Pleistocene coastal occupation andAbstract: There are few archaeological sites that contain records for Pleistocene coastal occupation in Australia, as is the case globally. Two major viewpoints seek to explain why so few sites exist. The first is that the Pleistocene coast was a relatively marginal environment where fluctuating sea levels actively inhibited coastal resource productivity until the mid-to-late Holocene. The second position suggests that the Pleistocene coast (and its resources) was variably productive, potentially hosting extensive populations, but that the archaeological evidence for this occupation has been submerged by sea level rise. To help reconcile these perspectives in Australia, this paper provides a review, discussion, and assessment of the evidence for Australian Pleistocene coastal productivity and occupation. In doing so, we find no reason to categorically assume that coastal landscapes were ever unproductive or unoccupied. We demonstrate that the majority of Pleistocene coastal archaeology will be drowned where dense marine faunal assemblages should only be expected close to palaeo-shorelines. Mixed terrestrial and marine assemblages are likely to occur at sites located >2 km from Pleistocene shorelines. Ultimately, the discussions and arguments put forward in this paper provide a basic framework, and a different set of environmental expectations, within which to assess the results of independent coastal research. Highlights: Addresses Pleistocene coastal occupation and productivity in Australia. Australian Pleistocene coasts were likely widely occupied and variably productive. A basic framework within which to assess coastal occupation patterns is provided. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Quaternary science reviews. Volume 293(2022)
- Journal:
- Quaternary science reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 293(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 293, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 293
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0293-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-01
- Subjects:
- Pleistocene -- Coastal archaeology -- Australia -- Sea levels
Geology, Stratigraphic -- Quaternary -- Periodicals
Stratigraphie -- Quaternaire -- Périodiques
551.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02773791 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/quaternary-science-reviews/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107706 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-3791
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7210.220000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23356.xml