Right heart strain assessment on CTPA following acute pulmonary embolism: Interobserver variability between expert radiologists and physicians. (August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Samaranayake, Chinthaka B.; Craigie, Michelle; Kempny, Aleksander; Bell, Peter T.; McCann, Andrew; Wahi, Sudhir; Upham, John W.; McCabe, Colm; Coucher, John; Keir, Gregory
• Is Part Of: Respiratory medicine. Volume 200(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-08
• Subjects: Pulmonary embolism -- Risk stratification -- Right heart strain -- CTPA -- Accuracy -- Interobserver variability; Chest -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Chest -- Diseases -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals; Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Thorax -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Appareil respiratoire -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.2
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106928
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0954-6111

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Accuracy of right heart strain (RHS) measured on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) scans by non-radiologists is unknown. We assessed inter-observer variability of four RHS features and determined the accuracy of measurements by respiratory physicians. Method: 1560 consecutive patients with acute PE were identified, and those who had a CTPA and an echocardiogram within 24-h included. CTPAs were independently scored prospectively by two radiologists, two thoracic physicians and a specialist registrar. Inter-observer variability was assessed, and diagnostic accuracy compared to echocardiography. Results: 182 patients (median age 62.8 years, IQR 49.8–71.5) with acute PE (7.7% high-risk, 40.7% intermediate high-risk, 31.3% intermediate low-risk and 20.3% low-risk) were included. Right ventricle to left ventricle diameter ratio (RV:LV) measurement had low inter-observer variability among the radiologists and non-radiologists with interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 (95%CI 0.92–0.97) and 0.96 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) respectively. RV:LV ratio had high diagnostic accuracy compared to RV dilatation on echocardiography (AUC 0.89, 95%CI 0.84–0.94 for radiologists and AUC 0.84, 95%CI 0.77–0.90 for non-radiologists). Main pulmonary artery to ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPA:Ao) measurement also had excellent agreement amongst the radiologists and non-radiologists (ICC 0.93 (95%CI 0.88–0.96) and 0.92 (95%CI 0.81–0.96) respectively). Significant variability was seen in the assessment of subjective features of RHS (leftward bowing of interventricular septum and contrast reflux into inferior vena cava) amongst the non-radiologists. Conclusion: RV:LV and MPA:Ao diameter ratios on CTPA measured by non-radiologists have low inter-observer variability and good agreement with radiologists, and can be reliably used where an expert report is unavailable. Highlights: Inter-observer agreement of CTPA RHS was compared between radiologists and physicians. 182 patients with acute PE who had a CTPA and echocardiogram within 24-hrs included. RV:LV ratio measured by physicians is reliable and can predict RV dilatation on echo. MPA:Ao ratio also had good agreement between radiologists and physicians.