Synchrotron radiation X‐ray imaging with large field of view and high resolution using micro‐scanning method. (12th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Rui; Wang, Yanping; Zhang, Jie; Deng, Tijian; Yi, Qiru; Yu, Bei; Huang, Mei; Li, Gang; Jiang, Xiaoming
• Is Part Of: Journal of synchrotron radiation. Volume 29:Part 5(2022)
• Page Start: 1241
• Page End: 1250
• Publication Date: 2022-08-12
• Subjects: synchrotron radiation X‐ray imaging -- micro‐scanning -- oversampled image -- point spread function (PSF); Synchrotron radiation -- Periodicals; Free electron lasers -- Periodicals; 539.73505
• DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522007652
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0909-0495

Abstract

Abstract : In synchrotron radiation X‐ray imaging, the spatial resolution under a fixed field of view is improved using the micro‐scanning method. Abstract : In synchrotron radiation X‐ray imaging, the imaging field of view and spatial resolution are mutually restricted, which makes it impossible to have both a large field of view and high resolution when carrying out experiments. Constructing an oversampled image through the micro‐scanning method and using the deconvolution algorithm to eliminate the point spread function introduced by pixel overlap can increase the resolution under a fixed imaging field of view, thereby improving the ratio of the field of view to the spatial resolution. In this paper, numerical simulation and synchrotron radiation experiments are carried out with a different number of micro‐scanning steps. In numerical simulation experiments only affected by the image pixel size, as the number of micro‐scanning steps increases, the ability of the oversampled image with deconvolution to improve the resolution is stronger. The achievable resolution of the oversampled image with deconvolution is basically the same as that of the sample image. In the synchrotron radiation experiments, the resolution of the oversampled image with deconvolution in the 2 × 2 mode is significantly improved. However, as the number of micro‐scanning steps increases, the resolution improvement is limited, or even no longer improved. Finally, by analyzing the results of numerical simulation and synchrotron radiation experiments, three factors (four other factors affecting the resolution besides the camera resolution, translational accuracy of micro‐scanning, and the signal‐to‐noise ratio of projections) affecting the micro‐scanning method are proposed and verified by experiments.