Nonlinear fusion method for multistage product design decision-making using plant growth simulation algorithm. (August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Yanpu; Yang, Qinxia; An, Weilan; Gong, Zheng
• Is Part Of: Advanced engineering informatics. Volume 53(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-08
• Subjects: Product design -- Decision-making -- Nonlinear fusion -- Multistage -- Plant growth simulation algorithm; Computer-aided engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 620.00285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101712
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1474-0346

Abstract

Abstract: Design decision-making is a vital activity for selecting an optimal scheme for product development. Owing to the uncertainty and ambiguity of design requirements and constraints, several product design phases are often deployed for concept refinement, which makes multistage product design decision-making (MPDDM) and the effective fusion of MPDDM data indispensable. However, few existing methods have considered the nonlinear relationships among the MPDDM information. Therefore, a nonlinear fusion method for MPDDM was proposed in this study. This method applies a three-parameter interval grey number to depict decision-makers' judgement about product design schemes. Based on converting linguistic judgements into interval scales, an interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was employed to calculate the weights of the design criteria, decision-makers, and decision-making stages. Considering the advantage of integrating multiple matrices without requiring external control parameters, a multistage decision-making fusion process using a plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA) was proposed to aggregate multistage decision-making data for product design. A case study was conducted to collect multistage decision-making data, and the PGSA was developed. Through comparison with the extant method, the effectiveness and feasibility of the fusion of MPDDM was verified. The results indicate that (1) uncertainty perceived by decision-makers at three stages accounted for 96.7%, 95%, and 97.2%, respectively. The "center of gravity" of a three-parameter interval grey number, which reflects the largest possibility of decision-makers' preferences, is not always equally distant from its maximum or minimum value (73.9%). (2) The optimization model using interval AHP to calculate the weights of decision-making indicators and stages is conducive to reducing the decision-maker's uncertainty. (3) The global search mechanism of the PGSA can effectively realize the nonlinear fusion of MPDDM.