Identification of diagnostic serum biomarkers for Hunner‐type interstitial cystitis. Issue 5 (20th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Torimoto, Kazumasa; Ueda, Tomohiro; Kasahara, Masato; Hirayama, Akihide; Matsushita, Chie; Matsumoto, Yoshihiro; Gotoh, Daisuke; Nakai, Yasushi; Miyake, Makito; Aoki, Katsuya; Fujimoto, Kiyohide
• Is Part Of: LUTS. Volume 14:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 334
• Page End: 340
• Publication Date: 2022-03-20
• Subjects: Hunner lesion -- interstitial cystitis -- lyso‐glycerophosphatidylcholine -- lyso‐phospholipid -- serum biomarker; Urology -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Urinary Tract Physiological Phenomena -- Periodicals; 616.62
• DOI: 10.1111/luts.12439
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-5664

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Diagnosis of Hunner‐type interstitial cystitis (HIC) relies on the ability to identify Hunner lesions endoscopically, which can lead to storage symptom misdiagnosis. Here, we examined serum biomarkers for HIC and verified their utility. Methods: Based on the previous definition of the Japanese guidelines, which did not distinguish HIC and non‐HIC diseases, we searched for serum biomarkers in 25 patients with interstitial cystitis (IC) and 25 control participants using metabolomics during 2013–2014. In 2019, we conducted a validation study in HIC and control groups. Serum samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, and candidate biomarker concentrations were compared between the groups using Mann–Whitney test. Results: Metabolomics targeted 678 metabolites and revealed that the levels of 14 lysolipids, seven γ‐glutamyl amino acids, and two monoacylglycerols were significantly different between the IC and control groups. The following metabolites were selected from each metabolite category as candidates: 1‐linoleoylglycerophosphocholine (1‐linoleloyl‐GPC [18:2]), γ‐glutamylisoleucine (γ‐Glu‐Ile), and 1‐arachidonylglycerol (1‐AG). The serum concentrations of 1‐linoleoyl‐GPC (18:2) in the HIC and control groups were 27 920 ± 6261 and 40 360 ± 1514 ng/mL ( P = 0.0003), respectively. The serum concentrations of γ‐Glu‐Ile and 1‐AG were not significantly different between the groups. When the cut‐off value of 1‐linoleoyl‐GPC (18:2) was set at 28 400 ng/mL, the sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 84%, respectively. Conclusions: Serum 1‐linoleoyl‐GPC (18:2) is a candidate diagnostic biomarker for HIC. Additional studies on whether this biomarker can distinguish HIC from other diseases with high urination frequency are required for its clinical use.