The current understanding of precision medicine and personalised medicine in selected research disciplines: study protocol of a systematic concept analysis. Issue 9 (7th September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The current understanding of precision medicine and personalised medicine in selected research disciplines: study protocol of a systematic concept analysis. Issue 9 (7th September 2022)
- Main Title:
- The current understanding of precision medicine and personalised medicine in selected research disciplines: study protocol of a systematic concept analysis
- Authors:
- Brew-Sam, Nicola
Parkinson, Anne
Lueck, Christian
Brown, Ellen
Brown, Karen
Bruestle, Anne
Chisholm, Katrina
Collins, Simone
Cook, Matthew
Daskalaki, Eleni
Drew, Janet
Ebbeck, Harry
Elisha, Mark
Fanning, Vanessa
Henschke, Adam
Herron, Jessica
Matthews, Emma
Murugappan, Krishnan
Neshev, Dragomir
Nolan, Christopher J
Pedley, Lachlan
Phillips, Christine
Suominen, Hanna
Tricoli, Antonio
Wright, Kristine
Desborough, Jane - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: The terms 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' have become key terms in health-related research and in science-related public communication. However, the application of these two concepts and their interpretation in various disciplines are heterogeneous, which also affects research translation and public awareness. This leads to confusion regarding the use and distinction of the two concepts. Our aim is to provide a snapshot of the current understanding of these concepts. Methods and analysis: Our study will use Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis to systematically examine the current understanding of the concepts 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' in clinical medicine, biomedicine (incorporating genomics and bioinformatics), health services research, physics, chemistry, engineering, machine learning and artificial intelligence, and to identify their respective attributes (clusters of characteristics) and surrogate and related terms. A systematic search of the literature will be conducted for 2016–2022 using databases relevant to each of these disciplines: ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, F1000Research, IEEE Xplore, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. These are among the most representative databases for the included disciplines. We will examine similarities and differences in definitions of 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' in the respective disciplines and acrossAbstract : Introduction: The terms 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' have become key terms in health-related research and in science-related public communication. However, the application of these two concepts and their interpretation in various disciplines are heterogeneous, which also affects research translation and public awareness. This leads to confusion regarding the use and distinction of the two concepts. Our aim is to provide a snapshot of the current understanding of these concepts. Methods and analysis: Our study will use Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis to systematically examine the current understanding of the concepts 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' in clinical medicine, biomedicine (incorporating genomics and bioinformatics), health services research, physics, chemistry, engineering, machine learning and artificial intelligence, and to identify their respective attributes (clusters of characteristics) and surrogate and related terms. A systematic search of the literature will be conducted for 2016–2022 using databases relevant to each of these disciplines: ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, F1000Research, IEEE Xplore, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. These are among the most representative databases for the included disciplines. We will examine similarities and differences in definitions of 'precision medicine' and 'personalised medicine' in the respective disciplines and across (sub)disciplines, including attributes of each term. This will enable us to determine how these two concepts are distinguished. Ethics and dissemination: Following ethical and research standards, we will comprehensively report the methodology for a systematic analysis following Rodgers' concept analysis method. Our systematic concept analysis will contribute to the clarification of the two concepts and distinction in their application in given settings and circumstances. Such a broad concept analysis will contribute to non-systematic syntheses of the concepts, or occasional systematic reviews on one of the concepts that have been published in specific disciplines, in order to facilitate interdisciplinary communication, translational medical research and implementation science. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 9(2022)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Issue 9(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 9 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0012-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09-07
- Subjects:
- Protocols & guidelines -- STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS -- QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060326 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23326.xml