Using machine learning to improve predictions and provide insight into fluvial sediment transport. Issue 8 (16th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lund, J. William; Groten, Joel T.; Karwan, Diana L.; Babcock, Chad
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 36:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-08-16
• Subjects: bedload -- hysteresis -- machine learning -- sediment rating curve -- sediment transport -- suspended sediment; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14648
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: A thorough understanding of fluvial sediment transport is critical to addressing many environmental concerns such as exacerbated flooding, degradation of aquatic habitat, excess nutrients, and the economic challenges of restoring aquatic systems. Fluvial sediment samples are integral for addressing these environmental concerns but cannot be collected at every river and time of interest. Therefore, to gain a better understanding for rivers where direct measurements have not been made, extreme gradient boosting machine learning (ML) models were developed and trained to predict suspended sediment and bedload from sampling data collected in Minnesota, United States (U.S.), by the U.S. Geological Survey. Approximately 400 watershed (full upstream area), catchment (nearby landscape), near‐channel, channel, and streamflow features were retrieved or developed from multiple sources, reduced to approximately 30 uncorrelated features, and used in the final ML models. The results indicate suspended sediment and bedload ML models explain approximately 70% of the variance in the datasets. Important features used in the models were interpreted with Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) plots, which provided insight into sediment transport processes. The most important features in the models were developed to normalize streamflow by the 2‐year recurrence interval and quantify the rate of change in streamflow (slope), which helped account for sediment hysteresis. Generally, this study also showed a combination of mostly watershed and catchment geospatial features were important in ML models that predict sediment transport from physical samples. This study is a promising step forward in making fluvial sediment transport predictions using machine learning models trained by physically collected samples. The approach developed here can be used wherever similar datasets exists and will be useful for landscape and water management. Abstract : Fluvial sediment samples are integral for addressing environmental concerns but cannot be collected at every river and time of interest. Therefore, machine learning models were trained with physical suspended sediment and bedload samples, streamflow, and geospatial features to predict sediment transport in rivers. Model results reflect the complex processes of sediment transport in rivers.