Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting. (1st June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting. (1st June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Kappa accuracy of prototypical diagnosis and ICD-10 criteria for mental disorders: A cross-sectional study in a real-life setting
- Authors:
- Rocha Neto, H.G.D.
Cavalcanti, M.
Telles Correia, D. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: The use of "operational criteria" in DSM-III was proposed as a solution to low reliability among psychiatrist's diagnosis. It is considered a turning point in the psychiatric classification and diagnostic process, furtherly adopted in ICD. However, the utility of using such criteria in everyday clinical practice is still not clear. Objectives: To measure agreement between prototypical and ICD-10 categorical diagnosis. Methods: In IPUB's outpatient clinics, psychiatry residents work in a real-life clinical scenario, attending patients from Rio de Janeiro/RJ-Brazil. Although regularly trained in ICD criteria, it is not usual to check every criterion in their daily practice. Thus, patients are diagnosed with a prototype-based disorder, not necessarily strictly attached to ICD criteria. We propose a cross-sectional study, where psychiatry residents check their clinical diagnosis according to ICD criteria and compare its agreement with kappa statistics. Results: Three of thirty residents joined the study, providing diagnosis for 146 patients under their care. Forty-five diagnoses were obtained before and 51 after ICD-10 criterion application. Diagnoses were grouped under 8 groups (Organic, Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Depression, Anxiety-Related Disorders, Personality Disorders, Neurodevelopmental Disorders), and kappa agreement obtained using ICD-10 diagnosis as the gold standard against prototypical diagnoses. OverallAbstract : Introduction: The use of "operational criteria" in DSM-III was proposed as a solution to low reliability among psychiatrist's diagnosis. It is considered a turning point in the psychiatric classification and diagnostic process, furtherly adopted in ICD. However, the utility of using such criteria in everyday clinical practice is still not clear. Objectives: To measure agreement between prototypical and ICD-10 categorical diagnosis. Methods: In IPUB's outpatient clinics, psychiatry residents work in a real-life clinical scenario, attending patients from Rio de Janeiro/RJ-Brazil. Although regularly trained in ICD criteria, it is not usual to check every criterion in their daily practice. Thus, patients are diagnosed with a prototype-based disorder, not necessarily strictly attached to ICD criteria. We propose a cross-sectional study, where psychiatry residents check their clinical diagnosis according to ICD criteria and compare its agreement with kappa statistics. Results: Three of thirty residents joined the study, providing diagnosis for 146 patients under their care. Forty-five diagnoses were obtained before and 51 after ICD-10 criterion application. Diagnoses were grouped under 8 groups (Organic, Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Depression, Anxiety-Related Disorders, Personality Disorders, Neurodevelopmental Disorders), and kappa agreement obtained using ICD-10 diagnosis as the gold standard against prototypical diagnoses. Overall kappa was 0.77 (IC - 0.69 - 0.85), ranging from 0.58 (Personality Disorders) to 0.91 (Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder). These findings also were reflected as high sensibility, specificity, Positive Predictive, and Negative Predictive values in all groups. Conclusions: Prototypical diagnostic elaboration, while probably based on previously learned, but not applied operational criteria, was equivalent to diagnostic obtained through ICD-10 categories. Disclosure: No significant relationships. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European psychiatry. Volume 65:Supplement 1(2022)
- Journal:
- European psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 65:Supplement 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 65, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0065-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S162
- Page End:
- S162
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-01
- Subjects:
- reliability -- psychiatry -- diagnosis -- validity
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Mental illness -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09249338 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09249338 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.434 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0924-9338
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.842700
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23307.xml