Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reitz, Daniel; Muecke, Johannes; da Silva Mendes, Vanessa; Landry, Guillaume; Reiner, Michael; Niyazi, Maximilian; Belka, Claus; Freislederer, Philipp; Corradini, Stefanie
• Is Part Of: Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. Volume 23(2022)
• Page Start: 134
• Page End: 139
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiation dosimetry -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Oncology -- Periodicals; 615.842
• DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-6316

Abstract

Abstract: Background and purpose: Patients receiving cranial radiotherapy are immobilized with a thermoplastic mask to restrict patient motion. Depending on the target volume margins and treatment dose, different mask systems are used. Intrafractional movements can be monitored using stereoscopic X-ray imaging. The aim of the present work was to compare the magnitudes of intrafractional deviation for different mask systems. Material and methods: Four different head mask systems (open face mask, open mask, stereotactic mask, double mask) used in the treatment of 40 patients were investigated. In total 487 treatment fractions and 3708 X-ray images were collected. Deviations were calculated by comparison of the acquired X-ray images with digitally reconstructed radiographs. The results of intrafractional X-ray deviations for translational and rotational axes were compared between the different mask systems. Results: Deviations were below 0.6 mm for translations and below 0.6° for rotations for all mask systems. Along the lateral and longitudinal directions the stereotactic mask was superior, while along the vertical direction the double mask showed the lowest deviations. For low rotational deviations the double mask is the best amongst all other mask systems. Conclusion: As expected, the lowest movement was shown using cranial stereotactic mask systems. The results have shown deviations lower than 0.6 mm and 0.6° using any of the four thermoplastic mask systems.