Domestic dog-wildlife interactions and support for pet regulations in protected areas. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zamora-Nasca, Lucía B.; Lambertucci, Sergio A.
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 273(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Canis lupus familiaris -- Online survey -- Domestic carnivore -- Protected areas -- Dog-wildlife interaction; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109705
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Effective management of non-native species in protected areas is fundamental for biodiversity conservation on a global level. In recent years, the extent of protected areas has increased along with the human population, and this has led to negative anthropic impacts within and along the edges of these areas. In particular, a non-native species, the domestic dog ( Canis lupus familiaris ), has become one of the main threats to wildlife in anthropized areas and their surroundings. Through an online survey we evaluated the relationship between four aspects that link society with dogs, wildlife and protected areas: i) awareness of dog-wildlife interaction, ii) appreciation of protected areas and wildlife, iii) level of concern about aggressive events on the part of dogs towards wildlife and people, and iv) level of agreement with measures to regulate dog access to protected areas. We also sought to map the potential threat of dogs to wildlife. We found that free-roaming dogs are widespread throughout Argentina: they are present in at least 78.5 % of the protected areas visited by respondents. The greater respondents' awareness of dog-wildlife interaction, the more concerned they were about dog attacks and the less they agreed with allowing dogs access to protected areas. Respondents' concerns about the threats from dogs depended on how often they had witnessed dog attacks on wildlife and their appreciation of protected areas and wildlife. A multidisciplinary management plan for free-roaming dogs is urgently needed. This should include controlling populations in sensitive areas, and conducting outreach campaigns on responsible pet ownership. Highlights: Free-roaming dogs were present in 78.5 % of Argentinean protected areas. We looked for concrete variables to address to mitigate the impact of dogs on wildlife. The greater dog's threat awareness, the less people agreed with allowing dogs access to protected areas. Dog's threat awareness depend on the frequency people witnessed dog attacks on wildlife. People concern about threats of dogs depend on their appreciation of protected areas and wildlife.