Critical elements of public acceptance and support for automated speed enforcement in British Columbia, Canada. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beaton, M. Denise; Oakey, Megan; Newhouse, Emily; Copley, Tobin T.; Fyfe, Murray; Karbakhsh, Mojgan; Turcotte, Kate; Zheng, Alex; Pike, Ian
• Is Part Of: Journal of transport & health. Volume 26(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Speeding -- Speed management -- Automated speed enforcement -- Community attitudes -- Public opinion; Transportation -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Periodicals; Public Health -- Periodicals; Noise, Transportation -- Periodicals; Air Pollutants -- Periodicals; 388
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101461
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-1405

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Although automated speed enforcement (ASE) technologies have broad potential to reduce the societal and economic impacts of transport injuries, perceptions of poor public support have thwarted their widespread deployment in British Columbia (B.C.), Canada. This study investigates the levels of acceptance and support for different types of speed enforcement, particularly ASE, and the influence of informative statements or suggested ASE policies on levels of acceptance and support among a representative sample of British Columbians. Methods: The online survey was conducted by Insights West, a public opinion research firm, in March 2018. Survey respondents were 802 British Columbians, stating their approval of 7 types of speed enforcement and 16 pro-ASE and con-ASE statements on a four-point Likert scale. They were also presented with two informative statements and 11 suggested ASE policies as a six-point Likert scale representing likelihood of support of ASE considering various critical elements. Results: The majority of British Columbians polled demonstrated acceptance and support for the use of ASE technologies in B.C., and strategies designed to foster strong public buy-in for implementation and expansion of ASE technologies were delineated. Conclusion: This survey highlighted the areas which need to be strengthened in order to garner and maintain sufficient community acceptance and support for the ASE program. The findings would be instructive for any jurisdiction that aims to deploy ASE technologies to reduce the burden of preventable transport injuries and deaths. Highlights: The majority of British Columbians demonstrated acceptance of the use of ASE in B.C. Fixed speed cameras in school/playground zones were the most supported ASE measure. 72% of respondents approved of ASE where police officers cannot safely operate. For 62%, clear reports of the ASE program impacts was likely to affect support.