Emissions of condensable organic aerosols from stationary combustion sources over Japan. (15th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morino, Yu; Chatani, Satoru; Fujitani, Yuji; Tanabe, Kiyoshi; Murphy, Benjamin N.; Jathar, Shantanu H.; Takahashi, Katsuyuki; Sato, Kei; Kumagai, Kimiyo; Saito, Shinji
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 289(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-11-15
• Subjects: Condensable particulate matter -- Filterable particulate matter -- Stationary sources -- Primary organic aerosol -- Secondary organic aerosol -- Percent modern carbon; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119319
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: Treatment of condensable particulate matter (CPM) is key for accurate simulation of atmospheric particulate matter (PM), because emission surveys of conventional stationary combustion sources do not measure CPM in many countries. This study updates previously estimated CPM emissions from stationary combustion sources in Japan by considering the relationship between the CPM fraction and filterable PM (FPM) concentrations for individual sources rather than by using a uniform CPM/FPM ratio for all sources. As a result of this update, the total emissions ratio of condensable organic aerosol (OA) to filterable PM2.5 (OACPM /PM2.5FPM ) from stationary combustion sources changes from ∼2.0 to 0.20, and the estimated concentrations of condensable OA, averaged over winter and over summer, changes from up to 3 μg m −3 to up to 0.2 μg m −3 . The range of the normalized mean bias for concentration of the simulated organic carbon (OC) in winter changes from (−78% to −9%) to (−83% to −28%), even though the proportion of modern carbon in total carbon is better estimated. The CPM contribution is likely to be overestimated when the source-dependent relationship between the CPM/FPM ratio and FPM concentration is not considered. Thus, accurate knowledge of the CPM/FPM ratio, particularly for sources with high FPM concentrations, is critical to improve CPM emission estimation. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Emissions of condensable PM from stationary combustion sources are newly estimated. Relationship between CPM fraction and FPM concentration should be considered. Smaller contribution of CPM in the updated estimate is consistent with observed pMC.